From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92421381F3 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8E83E0A8C; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE179E0A85 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4Geh-1UPin50xWN-00r0wu; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:42:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:41:59 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] external SSD problem Message-ID: <20130530154159.GT3387@server> References: <20130530124005.GS3387@server> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:QiU27/SY0lDe3Nk3gmuAdzMlDbdWY+P3teHt6vmfGlo LCAr8DE3TRQETQhylFFsqgq+V4/2AKKtQ4irEWrmcXNR11YOwH B4/fjPppU/wdci6tGVryvZhre5PEu3l7vzeB2Q2lA3voIP9wmi Px64U6gV5q8wfjRxyjz2lKC0gWnXTYSyxHBEI8sxVC09dW8W3x FwOYiuMWh48npVCXjI/P3c4w2oYP32nIudRVFO9ckbGZNOK31f u8YDGt+QvDI9DYYHw1EZBlQotREL1f6k1QUx8u+oWFKr6w5Xhl FEgxr1hOinISUTSgQ4eLB/v+dM+jk7kkXs3x4Tda8OmzlYE6TW 5AK1Rr04/jc0FA1HSOjE= X-Archives-Salt: 5fb23c5b-f730-43a1-9d30-a623dcf8962f X-Archives-Hash: 125c9f2d6df51ea841e5736e3cedc9c5 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:15:16AM -0700, Grant wrote: > > > > What happens if you issue "umount /mountpoint" from a vt, rather than clicking > > "eject" in Thunar? > > That does work fine as does right-click + Unmount from within Thunar. > Ejecting from within Thunar seems to be the troublesome one. It appears the problem is with Thunar's "eject" command then. IIRC the eject apps were more, if not especially, intended for CD-ROM devices. At any rate you need to investigate what is being run when this script is executed when you press the radio button (or whatever) in Thunar for "eject". sys-apps/util-linux obsoleted sys-apps/eject on 06 Sep 2012, and we still sys-block/eject in portage. Which one does Thunar call? Sorry I've no time for investigating, and don't have Thunar installed on any PC atm. Cheers, Bruce -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting