From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 23:51:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305262351.41186.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93dac986370ca717e03ae508d81d1173.squirrel@www.antarean.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1803 bytes --]
On Sunday 26 May 2013 22:35:14 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 25 May 2013, at 22:26, Nick Khamis wrote:
> >> ... As mentioned this
> >> would be two separate DSL services, connected using separate bridges.
> >> I think I am describing more of a link aggregation or bonding....
> >>
> >> Also assuming that the service providers support bonding of the links
.
> >
> > Here in the UK this is a somewhat common thing - there are a number of
>
> ISPs which
>
> > offer bonded xDSL services.
> >
> > It's certainly possible to use a Linux router to manage such a
> > connection, although I don't know the details.
> >
> > http://www22.brinkster.com/findall/bondedcd.html
> >
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/reviews/adsl-bonding-how-to-and-revie
> > w.html
>
> Bonding network devices together is quite simple, but it needs to be
> configured on both ends.
> In other words, to merge 2 DSL-connections together using bonding, you
> need to get both from the same ISP and the ISP would need to support it on
> their end.
>
> If bonding can't be done on the ISP-side, you can use seperate
> load-balancing/failover using other techniques.
There's different ways of going about it, without or without MLPPP, depending
on what your ISP offers:
http://wiki.aa.org.uk/index.php/Linux_upload_bonding_using_multipath_routing
http://wiki.aa.org.uk/index.php/Linux_upload_bonding_using_policy_routing
It used to be the case that Cisco 1800/2800 routers were used at customers'
premises for MLPPP with certain UK ISPs, but since BT started implementing
21CN (ADSL2+) they are using ERX core routers (Juniper) and no longer support
MLPPP. I understand that MPLS is used instead these days, but have no
experience in its implementation.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-26 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-25 20:48 [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) Nick Khamis
2013-05-25 21:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 13:17 ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 15:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Stroller
2013-05-26 21:35 ` J. Roeleveld
2013-05-26 22:51 ` Mick [this message]
2013-05-26 23:40 ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 23:40 ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27 0:16 ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27 8:14 ` Mick
2013-05-27 13:07 ` thegeezer
2013-05-27 13:53 ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27 14:31 ` thegeezer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201305262351.41186.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox