public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 23:51:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305262351.41186.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93dac986370ca717e03ae508d81d1173.squirrel@www.antarean.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1803 bytes --]

On Sunday 26 May 2013 22:35:14 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 25 May 2013, at 22:26, Nick Khamis wrote:
> >> ... As mentioned this
> >> would be two separate DSL services, connected using separate bridges.
> >> I think I am describing more of a link aggregation or bonding....
> >> 
> >> Also assuming that the service providers support bonding of the links….
> > 
> > Here in the UK this is a somewhat common thing - there are a number of
> 
> ISPs which
> 
> > offer bonded xDSL services.
> > 
> > It's certainly possible to use a Linux router to manage such a
> > connection, although I don't know the details.
> > 
> > http://www22.brinkster.com/findall/bondedcd.html
> > 
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/reviews/adsl-bonding-how-to-and-revie
> > w.html
> 
> Bonding network devices together is quite simple, but it needs to be
> configured on both ends.
> In other words, to merge 2 DSL-connections together using bonding, you
> need to get both from the same ISP and the ISP would need to support it on
> their end.
> 
> If bonding can't be done on the ISP-side, you can use seperate
> load-balancing/failover using other techniques.

There's different ways of going about it, without or without MLPPP, depending 
on what your ISP offers:

http://wiki.aa.org.uk/index.php/Linux_upload_bonding_using_multipath_routing

http://wiki.aa.org.uk/index.php/Linux_upload_bonding_using_policy_routing


It used to be the case that Cisco 1800/2800 routers were used at customers' 
premises for MLPPP with certain UK ISPs, but since BT started implementing 
21CN (ADSL2+) they are using ERX core routers (Juniper) and no longer support 
MLPPP.  I understand that MPLS is used instead these days, but have no 
experience in its implementation.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-26 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-25 20:48 [gentoo-user] IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) Nick Khamis
2013-05-25 21:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 13:17   ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 15:47   ` [gentoo-user] " Stroller
2013-05-26 21:35     ` J. Roeleveld
2013-05-26 22:51       ` Mick [this message]
2013-05-26 23:40         ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-26 23:40           ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27  0:16             ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27  8:14               ` Mick
2013-05-27 13:07 ` thegeezer
2013-05-27 13:53   ` Nick Khamis
2013-05-27 14:31     ` thegeezer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201305262351.41186.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox