From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-146588-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3551381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 10:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 740EBE0CC1;
	Sun,  7 Apr 2013 10:57:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACB1E0C9F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 10:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5A4028008D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 11:57:15 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:57:14 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes
Message-ID: <20130407115714.6022ebb5@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <kjqnrm$gn7$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <5159E551.4050609@gmail.com>
	<201304020100.25920.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
	<CAEH5T2PTjSx7Gd_y4g03vvqwFKFgNxia2t7ai5uG0Km=DPfEbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<515B2FAE.20607@gmail.com>
	<kjjcha$eod$2@ger.gmane.org>
	<515D442A.1090209@gmail.com>
	<515D7AF4.5020104@libertytrek.org>
	<20130405161759.GA3456@linux1>
	<515F0AA7.808@libertytrek.org>
	<20130405184128.GA3820@linux1>
	<20130406011439.GA3980@waltdnes.org>
	<20130406094328.5ecd3cdc@digimed.co.uk>
	<CAA2qdGWAZyji-KHseDt_x+kZtEpoRt30+GpdNCNXPPNROaf74w@mail.gmail.com>
	<kjqnrm$gn7$1@ger.gmane.org>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0-156-gf9f793 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/DOr=l=fCkOs7eU+6cVnjQS7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: b1f62adb-4604-468c-b401-f5c3347867f4
X-Archives-Hash: f01a82c82f14cdcec1cf536acf950247

--Sig_/DOr=l=fCkOs7eU+6cVnjQS7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 03:06:30 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:

> Wha?  I swear I was told that you could not reliably name the
> iterfaces eth[0-n] using udev rules (which is what I've always done
> without problems) because of "race conditions".  So I changed over to
> net[0-n] on one machine, and was planning on doing so on the others
> soon.
>=20
> Can we still use udev rules to name interfaces eth[0-n] or not?

Yes, just as before. And just as before, you cannot rely on it working
every time.


--=20
Neil Bothwick

<Linuxgeek> How do i find the model of my card?
<Serena[T]> your nick is misleading, seriously

--Sig_/DOr=l=fCkOs7eU+6cVnjQS7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlFhUQsACgkQum4al0N1GQN6aQCgwws8adI0Z/zysTzkvEzoZm7p
8acAnip7OZjegc//UD6h2JXAxbx2tCsa
=BTer
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/DOr=l=fCkOs7eU+6cVnjQS7--