From: Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ntp-daemons
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:58:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304040158.29511.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304032245.30945.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1477 bytes --]
[Sorry if this not entirely coherent: it's growing late here.]
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 22:45:11 Mick wrote:
> Do you have chronyc set up to signal off/online status to chronyd? If
> so, where do you run it from?
No, I don't need to bother with manual control: it just works for me. I did
play with chronyc years ago but I soon got bored.
I have chronyd running on my LAN server, getting its time from several hosts
Out There, then internal hosts get their time from the LAN server. All very
straightforward. Any time errors just ramp themselves steadily down to zero.
I can show you my config files if you like.
In those old 486/586 days the author used to publish a new version for each
new generation of CPU, but I haven't seen that since x86_64 came on the
scene. I suppose he must have found another way of calibrating his object
code's execution time. Whatever the case, I'm happy that gkrellm etc. show
the time to at least the nearest half-second relative to BBC time signals.
I started using chrony in those old dial-up days because it can handle slow
links. Also intermittent ones, by which I mean systems that shut down for
some of the day, or that dual-boot with Windross,. I haven't felt a need to
change since then. At that time ntpd was at a disadvantage IIRC. You might
say that chrony is designed for desktop boxes rather than the servers that
ntpd likes, though the edges are pretty blurred.
--
Yours, happy camper of Tideswell,
Peter
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4585 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 23:36 [gentoo-user] ntp-daemons Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-04-03 8:28 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2013-04-03 10:03 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-04-03 10:21 ` Marc Stürmer
2013-04-03 10:38 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-04-03 15:21 ` Mick
2013-04-03 15:41 ` Peter Humphrey
2013-04-03 21:45 ` Mick
2013-04-04 0:58 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304040158.29511.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org \
--to=peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox