public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 3.7.9: Lots of devices are  root root rw-------.
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:32:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130225213219.GB15821@acm.acm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512AA6AB.7020306@gmail.com>

Hi, Alan.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:47:55AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/02/2013 23:40, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 06:08:19PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 24/02/2013 13:02, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>>> On 23/02/2013 19:18, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >>>>> Hi, Gentoo!

> >>>>> Just built the new kernel 3.7.9 last night, and it's one of these
> >>>>> "nothing works" situations.

> >>> Sorry, I was exaggerating here.  I can work normally as long as I don't
> >>> try to use a peripheral, such as printer, audio, or scanner.  My network
> >>> connection is working OK.

> >>>>> It seems the problems are with the device files, whose ownership is set
> >>>>> to "root root" (rather than, e.g., "root audio") and whose permissions
> >>>>> are set to crw------- (rather than the expected crw-rw----).

> >>>>> I'm still running udev-171-r10.  This might well make a difference.

> >>>>> Needless to say, everything works under kernel 3.6.11.  It would be nice
> >>>>> if there were some mistake in my kernel config.

> >>>>> Could somebody help me get this fixed, please.

> > [ .... ]

> >> I suppose your next step is to examine udev's logs where it creates the
> >> various devices.

> > And I promised myself some months ago I would _never_ spend time on udev
> > innards.  ;-(

> > So, I set the debugging options inside /etc/conf.d/udev, which causes
> > /run/udev/udev.log to be created.

> > On the failing 3.7.9, /run/udev/udev.log terminates abruptly with an
> > error message, with the entire file, 55 lines, looking like this:

> > 1361736665.547175 [1761] parse_file: reading '/lib/udev/rules.d/10-dm.rules' as rules file
> > 1361736665.547289 [1761] parse_file: reading '/run/udev/rules.d/10-root-link.rules' as rules file
> > [ ..... ]
> > 1361736665.553901 [1761] parse_file: reading '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-upower-wup.rules' as rules file
> > 1361736665.553924 [1761] parse_file: reading '/lib/udev/rules.d/97-bluetooth-hid2hci.rules' as rules file
> > 1361736665.553971 [1761] udev_rules_new: rules use 108624 bytes tokens (9052 * 12 bytes), 31856 bytes buffer
> > 1361736665.553977 [1761] udev_rules_new: temporary index used 48860 bytes (2443 * 20 bytes)
> > 1361736665.554010 [1761] main: error creating epoll fd: Function not implemented

> > I hope "epoll fd", whatever that may be, is something critically
> > important to justify just stopping udev.  But it can't be that important
> > if kernel 3.6.11 doesn't emit such an event.  It looks like the kernel's
> > event interface has changed.

> > It seems that the contents of /dev, such as they were, were created
> > directly by the kernel when devtmpfs was mounted.  Normally they would be
> > modified into something usable by udev.

> > Maybe I should just bite the bullet and go through the pain of updating
> > my udev to version 197-r8.  :-(


> Sounds logical to me, I'd conclude the same.

> Perhaps you should report your findings to b.g.o just in case the
> DEPENDS and config options between kernel and udev need to be tweaked in
> the ebuilds (I'd hate to see many users have to go through the same as
> yourself)

I did that this morning (European time).  I suspect I'll get an answer
along the lines of "what do you expect if you use old versions?".

> Got it on the pain you feel, I avoid looking into udev like it was the
> plague. Some days I wonder if going back to MAKEDEV wouldn't be far
> simpler in Gentoo land.....

MAKEDEV??

I spent some time this afternoon making sure I knew how to chroot
effectively, using my old "mdev system" as a rescue system.  Probably
updating udev will just go OK for me.  I'll wait until I here back from
the Gentoo guys on my bug report.

Thanks for the help in sorting this out.

> -- 
> Alan McKinnon
> alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-25 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-23 17:18 [gentoo-user] Kernel 3.7.9: Lots of devices are root root rw------- Alan Mackenzie
2013-02-24  8:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-24 11:02   ` Alan Mackenzie
2013-02-24 16:08     ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-24 21:40       ` Alan Mackenzie
2013-02-24 23:47         ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-25 21:32           ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130225213219.GB15821@acm.acm \
    --to=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox