From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8409F198005 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 816C0E0586; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail119c7.megamailservers.com (mail119c7-2520.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B38AE04E7 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:16:26 +0000 (UTC) X-POP-User: admin.sys-concept.com Received: from syscon7.localdomain (S01060050da7ae68c.ed.shawcable.net [68.149.90.13]) by mail119c7.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1NEGOTN030578 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:16:25 -0500 Received: by syscon7.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A297F203D84; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:16:24 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:16:24 -0700 From: Joseph To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No space left on device ? Message-ID: <20130223141624.GB3444@syscon7.inet> References: <20130223050004.GC5625@syscon7.inet> <512855B8.4080904@nileshgr.com> <20130223060537.GD5625@syscon7.inet> <20130223062102.GE5625@syscon7.inet> <20130223085233.4dd35f50@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130223085233.4dd35f50@digimed.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=a+A/LwnboRtF0YoECdU3S0gDGgFgKEZYRf+D0g6YxRY= c=1 sm=1 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=NmsTTJYueWQA:10 a=nDghuxUhq_wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:17 a=dsOi0wIicQNPwdcJHfgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.5128CF39.0080,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Archives-Salt: d1a5ba89-2e3a-44d4-b082-3d94b79f98ae X-Archives-Hash: a80ad3d2dca6ee5b4094935e709c3ec1 On 02/23/13 08:52, Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:21:02 -0700, Joseph wrote: > >> Got it. I change it to: >> tmpfs /var/tmp/portage devtmpfs >> size=1512M,nr_inodes=1M 0 0 > >Why are you using devtmpfs? You should be using tmpfs for this, which >defaults to half your available RAM. devtmpfs is a special option >for early-boot /dev only. > > >-- >Neil Bothwick I was following the instruction from recent "udev" upgrade: Upgrading udev from 171 (or older) to 197 ----copy-------- - The need of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y in the kernel; need to verify the fstype for possible /dev line in /etc/fstab is devtmpfs (and not, for example, tmpfs) ---end coopy---- So I change both lines in fstab: shm /dev/shm devtmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 tmpfs /var/tmp/portage devtmpfs size=2048M,nr_inodes=1M 0 0 -- Joseph