From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844E71389A1 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 192EC21C04C; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4273F21C042 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so5273064wey.28 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:22:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=wiyDFrpcw8cQz4PFZmPaeEmoyG7vMOhSs3qsCM2FSEM=; b=XILmAOKrR5EgfI9nSL/ZVorFD2fSc80Mn+/mRa5zPL3U/dVcD4e3mLP12rtF144PeA 4n82NDpauPH4OjsdASYb/QtWT1CYOlAmD93jARZ8Wbdrzdud6zunTXu6gwNKT3ZxspgU 8u5juH/mIsYNFGQxls84PHXsQijMcfFmtsmZdPttRXMzdkArFaizhvPD77hiX/gmGEAI gmNf7Po/onlEoGc1Vll1HeLUszZuxpAaz2XabyIF8bHbtnmrOBv2TxjKixkDzno2qd4L /Dbtc/YicYkW+TZELUk/UFi1nYJSc2l5UN1rcCR56F4dMwvKyW45YSJzq7T+Ad0wISNi pgVA== X-Received: by 10.180.97.197 with SMTP id ec5mr17075364wib.1.1360599777902; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm31560862wiy.6.2013.02.11.08.22.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:14:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <51191074.5030801@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <51191074.5030801@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2136371.Zyx8Y2FXkT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302111622.36229.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9fe73b13-b234-48cc-8275-ab10b3128e20 X-Archives-Hash: 8b35fffd433d417d79db3aa58e8063e3 --nextPart2136371.Zyx8Y2FXkT Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 11 Feb 2013 15:38:28 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 07.02.2013 22:38, schrieb Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s: > > For what is worth, you also don't need to specify neither /dev nor > > /proc in fstab with systemd. I'm not sure the init system has anything > > to do with it, though; I believe is udev work, so with a recent > > version of udev, no matter the init system (I think), /dev and /proc > > are unnecessary (and perhaps even problematic) in /etc/fstab. >=20 > In my fstab there is the line(s): >=20 > # NOTE: The next line is critical for boot! > proc /proc proc defaults 0= 0 >=20 > both outdated? >=20 > ;-) I would think so. This is the only line that I have in mine and the system boots fine: # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for=20 # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will # use almost no memory if not populated with files) tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2136371.Zyx8Y2FXkT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEZGswACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYiDQCeMFNX+l3IgBMpA7qgmhs7uUNh gacAn14h00ZabeVh6ZqqB2GyUOnEgKoG =pyqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2136371.Zyx8Y2FXkT--