public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:23:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131172312.4595fc24@khamul.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiD0PYZ7tDr_zbq0gYeLPPp-MrTsjL4ahJL0yCr1h1bYfg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:35:06 -0500
Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
> steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
> 
> The news item instructions specified that I had to remove
> udev-postmount from my runlevels. I didn't have udev-postmount in my
> runlevels, so I didn't remove it. Turns out, that dictum also applies
> to udev-mount. So after removing that[1], I was able to at least boot
> again.
> 
> Udev also complained about DEVTMPFS not being enabled in the
> kernel.[2]  I couldn't get into X, but I could log in via getty and a
> plain old vt, so I enabled it, rebuilt the kernel, installed it and
> rebooted...and now that's presumably covered.
> 
> I'm now able to get into X, but when I try to run an xterm, it fails.
> Checking ~/.xsession_errors, I find:
> 
> xterm: Error 32, error 2: No such file or directory
> Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys
> 
> I find this bizarre, as I'd never had any trouble with xterm in this
> way before. What'd I do wrong, and how do I recover? I don't trust
> emerging at this point; I tried re-emerging udev, and I aborted after
> I saw an stderr line about failing to open a pty, even though portage
> does quiet builds for parallel building by default...so I doubt
> whatever emitted that line on stderr was being properly guarded
> against the failure.
> 
> [1] I didn't have a boot cd or similar to work with, so I used the old
> init=/bin/sh trick on the command line. That was functional. And then
> I tried init=/usr/bin/vim, and things got real. :)
> 
> [2] Sparking a bemused discussion with a friend at tonight's LUG
> meeting over the devfs->udev->udev+devtmpfs progression, but that's a
> different story.

I can't get any kernel >=gentoo-sources-3.7.1 to work properly with
vtys either.

3.7.1 is fine, anything earlier is fine.
I haven't bothered tracking it down further than that (have a severe
dose of laziness right now...)

What kernel are you running on these affected hosts?

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-31 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-31  3:35 [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys Michael Mol
2013-01-31  4:45 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-01-31  4:48   ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-01-31 13:26     ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 13:47       ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 14:05         ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 14:30           ` Peter Humphrey
2013-01-31 14:37             ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 18:24               ` Mick
2013-01-31 18:29                 ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 14:31           ` Michael Mol
2013-01-31 14:45             ` Peter Humphrey
2013-01-31 15:23 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2013-01-31 15:26   ` Michael Mol
2013-02-02 15:21 ` Alex Schuster
2013-02-02 19:17   ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-02 20:31     ` Neil Bothwick
2013-02-02 20:47       ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-02 20:53         ` Bruce Hill
2013-02-03 11:24         ` Neil Bothwick
2013-02-03 12:02           ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-03 14:54             ` Neil Bothwick
2013-02-03 17:24               ` Alan McKinnon
2013-02-03 19:08                 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-02-03 19:23                 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-02-02 21:06     ` Michael Mol
2013-02-03 17:51     ` Alex Schuster
2013-02-03 19:08       ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2013-02-07 17:40       ` [gentoo-user] " Tanstaafl
2013-02-07 17:53         ` Peter Humphrey
2013-02-07 20:53           ` Tanstaafl
2013-02-07 21:25             ` Paul Hartman
2013-02-07 21:37               ` Tanstaafl
2013-02-07 22:00                 ` Alecks Gates
2013-02-07 22:12                   ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2013-02-08  7:29                 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2013-02-08 16:02                 ` Paul Hartman
2013-02-08 20:17                 ` Peter Humphrey
2013-02-11  1:40                 ` Stroller
2013-02-07 21:38               ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-02-11 15:38                 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-02-11 16:14                   ` Mick
2013-02-11 17:36                     ` Dale
2013-02-11 19:41                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130131172312.4595fc24@khamul.example.com \
    --to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox