From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE81383D6 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F00D721C01F; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0BCE05F1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t49so546057wey.0 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UPd0I4pKHI3gRi8hCxM5rc4Qz5fzNItwDZwc1ksjVcY=; b=04f0sXyu4R6k8+3Qpd5HHRKFxxaMky9YmzD6JCsBjzbNVYPewIn+383iR9TFD5gBnX ppAPDvmS8r4TV+d00pDoVx07eIcs6wyH6dmcRstcbTmXsyneLBWDmtk/ZoCrEs1G/jp2 X7UTI2lFoxHRqdXcVXr2djICpgVPBmJvxuqvMfsr69Qvw3FFF1/ggNvNUPUgBMylrlEU rnOrWKT8pKISWoEVGMe0F8qhggOb/qFFgSpTE+t/KXV0uzTgmMP382FfXDoYzejDqWGM noyvS6tCBRlxmmWJo3NWVEYnFiS/5zPV8rXGXUcwO+4VE41sE0nq/kv1MHIoFABr9JOj Qjbw== X-Received: by 10.180.73.80 with SMTP id j16mr11891940wiv.5.1357856068233; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:14:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from khamul.example.com (196-215-209-88.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.215.209.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fv2sm10291985wib.4.2013.01.10.14.14.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:14:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:14:18 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) Message-ID: <20130111001418.730ec4a6@khamul.example.com> In-Reply-To: <20130110214115.GA12004@waltdnes.org> References: <50ED1969.3010309@st.com> <50ED3205.5050803@gmail.com> <20130109113203.0aea38c0@khamul.example.com> <20130109224230.GC17453@crowfix.com> <20130110214115.GA12004@waltdnes.org> Organization: Internet Solutions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: aecb0789-ce3c-4f77-b4f1-3b077da2da5b X-Archives-Hash: cc53981102179e45c3d1eb50b38be48b On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:41:15 -0500 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:42:30PM -0800, felix@crowfix.com wrote > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:32:03AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 03:01:57 -0600 > > > Dale wrote: > > > > > > > Since this is > > > > depreciated, which generally means no longer maintained > > > > > > > > > > > > The word you want is "deprecated". > > > > > > "depreciated" is something else entirely, it's what your employer > > > does to the book value of your company car over 5 years to get > > > the value down to nothing. > > > > > > > > > > "Depreciated" is perfectly cromulent in this instance. > > You really think it's copacetic? > I never heard of copacetic till now, had to look it up. What a wonderful word, I feel embiggened by it's correctness -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com