From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D561382B2 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74D0121C096; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7592421C002 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o1so40273wic.17 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=sQU5eiHh4v2i/oPGhPShKaXOhhn6Cwq7MQh293ie0sA=; b=UuVE8YRdfXXgv+XYcI/+AgJUB7l+LSDAEaO5c613Mbmu3R/iqh4/CD1KjQ9Exd0j8f e+SEZIVikr8LyPdCDuN8ZdYAZY0MqVp9epH6u+FBRpeVfaKGf79MlwDLLtiTcUpOKeGL SqbLSXCKLMYKZ2l9vfWxOzgtWXlRyCFHZVtnABRXzCeJgPulklftl2PUpKwn00ljC+hf 1Tm1JPimV0lfLAulCo1XWzzWRyIqpqkJ9mgucl55qcEl/UciVhDjJ8JDvXmdgWDpGpxF iUzEH/BR2+zrvqd8/V64PiS5bHHtMXrCjuyBgUJ1LRCrGw1OuHZJaijuyrCo1DGCx5AH 6DMg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.238 with SMTP id bz14mr76076604wjb.9.1357319411047; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm37416004wiz.1.2013.01.04.09.10.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:10:10 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2? Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:09:54 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.9.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <50E656E1.8040001@electronsweatshop.com> In-Reply-To: <50E656E1.8040001@electronsweatshop.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart18855501.86lCk4gX9q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201301041709.56472.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: bfc40851-ce21-49cf-875c-ee007edee6a9 X-Archives-Hash: 64951102b49304a63ccd68e5816a2a2e --nextPart18855501.86lCk4gX9q Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 04 Jan 2013 04:13:21 Randy Barlow wrote: > On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the > > mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've > > seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? >=20 > Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. > For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for > reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great > features and extensions. >=20 > For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to > configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. Can mutt be made to use autocompletion for email addresses and to=20 automatically select encryption keys (gpg and/or s/mime)? Last time I tried it briefly this became a sticking point for me ... =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart18855501.86lCk4gX9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlDnDOQACgkQVTDTR3kpaLY1oACg8rD2mUO4FV8gjCK5vqLUIZ6D cQEAoNtlVf7DuS/cR359w1XqHW1M3a5f =x5VB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart18855501.86lCk4gX9q--