From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C149E138299 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 03:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F19A421C01B; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 03:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B530421C01B for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 03:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MYwe3-1TUfPV0Cwt-00Vo50; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:09:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:09:21 -0600 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade Message-ID: <20130104030921.GV20719@server> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:8JMX9UpzFUQwUxXeDNZbOwMyjz+Zdyt+7ya3IKGQWFU 946RWADX1rqFFYI6Xmun0xy9z0SPDTjIsJPE5hTZYSWAMVQuS7 +lH0w1m0HkW8+WUYk6ZkXfgYlN+94sN450zzLNh9zu0gJcO+Vg 2gf8ZGuQuV0htFGJaPdDfJgz+aY6ntxql2XlebPO6jKUO6H/Wu JiMrWG5uyAm7YzUVymrnzokcd0BobzRj5GH8jzUHzuHs6hZCnK QVfBUCrM22zw6mKwJ6GCSaM5C9ddLJwyYIEKfPjXrJZHlEOFEL N1XxCcKuQZNCREZAszow3uHGx+q0Y+VcP5RBCiBIPWyxKeUnsg fsEeMMQn+fBwkpLI42Z8O+dFHgfvxnUdXseRqcUT5 X-Archives-Salt: 38e6118b-52a9-4698-b46f-1f9e68531d46 X-Archives-Hash: 3677303f5700eb0a3cac1182697529f3 On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:54:31AM +0000, James wrote: > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > > > So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to > > udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196....... > > (ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.) > > Long night, when you have to answer your own posts..... > > Now I get: > > > emerge -p1u udev > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9 [196-r1] USE="rule_generator%* > -action_modeswitch% -build% -debug% -edd% (-extras) -floppy% {-test%}" > [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1) > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > sys-fs/udev:0 > > (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > > >=sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?] > required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed) > > (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by > (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot) > > > ideas? > > > James Too late, too tired, but do you have: >=sys-fs/udev-181 in /etc/portage/package.mask ? -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting