From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:14:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301031614.48998.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130103123352.096927f0@khamul.example.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3891 bytes --]
On Thursday 03 Jan 2013 10:33:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +0000
>
> Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
> > of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
> > created a new user. Importing the e-mails from a backup of the old
> > version omitted large numbers of e-mails, including a lot of complete
> > folders. I also noticed that kmail had not created a trash folder.
>
> So the kdepim devs STILL haven't fixed that one? Oh dear.
>
> tldr; longish post. Short version: Use something else. It's mail, not
> software magic.
>
> I ran into something much the same long ago with kamil2
> around the 4.3 or 4.5 era. Imports wouldn't work, akonadi was displaying
> essentially random mails in random folders in no special order, and I
> was losing mail.
>
> Eventually, after much physical and spiritual pain, I figured that what
> was really happening was probably akonadi importing the mail to
> $SOMEWHERE and $AT_SOME_RANDOM_TIME would index it properly; it would
> do this on the basis off $WHEN_IT_FELT_RIGHT_TO_DO_IT.
>
> This trick works awesomely well for caching thumbnails of my video
> collection for xbmc. It works less well for my mail. It's disastrous
> when the whole process is not documented, when the user has no
> visibility into it and no defined way of seeing what's going on, not
> even a progress meter. The traditional way of handling such
> asynchronous indexing problems is to provide an option where the user
> can force a re-index and the system will just chug along doing it
> displaying progress. If the mail app suspends itself while doing this,
> well that's fine, at least it ends in a reasonable time. But, kdepim at
> that stage had no such option.
>
> One other thing I discovered back then: if I killed akonadi & kdepim
> and rebooted out of sheer frustration, it would *throw* *away* all it's
> temporary files form $SOMEWHERE as above and corrupt it's own database.
> Leading to lost mail. If you just leave the damn thing alone for ages
> and ages it eventually sorts itself out, but you can't see how far
> along it is.
>
> Such shoddy alpha-quality software shipped and billed as enterprise
> production-ready was more than I could bear, so I just switched mail
> client to claws-mail.
>
> On 4.9.3 you are still experiencing something similar. Hmmm. Indicates
> to me a high probability of a systemic problem with the projects
> approach, something that is unlikely to ever get really fixed. In my
> opinion kdepim2 is vastly over-engineered and an attempt to solve a
> problem that does not actually exist. I recommend you use a different
> mail app.
>
> As I mentioned in the tldr, it's a mail app. There are many mail apps
> and none are super-special.
Thankfully, I'm still on kmail-1.13.7 and I am dreading the time that it will
no longer be available. I've used kmail for so many years now that everything
else I tried has been a great disappointment for me.
Last time I tried to upgrade to kmail 2 some time early last year (for the 4th
time) it made exactly the mess experienced by others, like:
- duplicate/multiple messages when I tried to delete them
- missing/disappearing messages
- inability to show anything other than the Inbox folder on IMAP4 accounts
I could swear that I waited for it to sync/resync, but I didn't leave the box
running overnight to see if that would fix this problem.
In all but one box I am not running a full KDE enchilada, so I don't know if
this has something to do with it. I just hope that new devs will eventually
take over this KDEPIM farce and something sane will surface for those of us
who still want/need to use a mail client.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3898 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-03 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 9:43 [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2? Peter Humphrey
2013-01-03 10:33 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-03 16:14 ` Mick [this message]
2013-01-03 17:09 ` [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?, " Peter Humphrey
2013-01-03 17:22 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2013-01-03 18:24 ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-03 18:34 ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-07 9:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-01-07 11:33 ` Jorge Almeida
2013-01-07 22:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-01-07 23:32 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-08 0:28 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-01-04 4:13 ` Randy Barlow
2013-01-04 17:09 ` Mick
2013-01-07 2:10 ` Peter Humphrey
2013-01-07 2:43 ` Randy Barlow
2013-01-07 7:54 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-04 21:37 ` [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?, " Peter Humphrey
2013-01-04 6:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-04 6:09 ` William Kenworthy
2013-01-03 17:09 ` [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?, " Peter Humphrey
2013-01-06 15:11 ` Francesco Talamona
2013-01-06 19:22 ` Mick
2013-01-07 5:23 ` Francesco Talamona
2013-01-03 17:22 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2013-01-06 14:30 ` Francesco Talamona
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301031614.48998.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox