From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845A2138264 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F37821C027; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1EF821C027 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x43so6889463wey.37 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:15:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=UnYMVgTctQ5jF/Y2e0UImK7aTJfE8pruz/EYF3Ulg0k=; b=Bd1KE9NsZKlKOTBsbjqdAjIWHJ0Jrhnta0yn/kONEEflBEhnEPmlrYJewuG7hBcSRy ONQwkCO+CFTKIqPUyi4oqKvcnNYnOG17c2xyViqiltYB578u4wcLh/W9ZezycNUzZAv8 TEtdfulsXoh196SEbvHNK6Vg2Rwgg/UuK/M8/DMcOFE6a2Mx/TydUJO6Us7vWr/P8aDx yB2bCtMnUu5JU5tsxMMBcX24uR/4sjGx/KYlcJwzz54rYKH3U6qfTT0apxiK3kRrsaIM KZUAWu/ffRZQqUpiHGkKIAqO+k0eLo9IBQh0/ol1DwtMWhAtJ+0136LAN0AWAR2MgBY1 acog== X-Received: by 10.194.123.105 with SMTP id lz9mr75593210wjb.43.1357172136497; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:15:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5sm82896373wia.10.2013.01.02.16.15.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:15:35 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPtables - Mangle table - when/why do I need it (or do I need it)? Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:14:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.9.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <50E43853.20203@libertytrek.org> <201301021902.22880.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <50E48EBF.50706@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <50E48EBF.50706@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4007284.OfHzDv18IM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201301030015.22315.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4e6644a6-8cbf-4fc9-b321-9a159831073a X-Archives-Hash: dc1020389be7456673a76c899fc6a0ee --nextPart4007284.OfHzDv18IM Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 02 Jan 2013 19:47:11 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-01-02 2:01 PM, Mick wrote: > > If you have a look at 'man iptables-extensions' it gives some examples = of > > using -t mangle. > >=20 > > I haven't looked in Google recently, but there should be some examples > > there too. >=20 > Oh, ok - so, if I don't have any rules that use the 'mangle' command, > then I can safely remove mangle support from my kernel and lose the > mangle table altogether? >=20 > Thanks guys... Yes, I would think so. You can build it as a module anyway and un/not load= it=20 to see if iptables starts up without errors. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4007284.OfHzDv18IM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlDkzZoACgkQVTDTR3kpaLaUOACeNF5pSB99UD4PBrFg81AV+0xS V/QAn3aJcPRCjQCCLlgxtvUpW61YsBWv =H9ha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4007284.OfHzDv18IM--