From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5141381FA for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A6F821C06F; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B830D21C00D for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:32:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsKAG6Zu09FpaL6/2dsb2JhbABEsnYDgRiBCIIWAQU6HDMLNBIUJTeIDroJi2KBRII8YgOIQoR8h1yFX4g6gViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="210892896" Received: from 69-165-162-250.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.165.162.250]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2012 13:32:32 -0500 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:32:21 -0500 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:32:21 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? Message-ID: <20121229183221.GA6975@waltdnes.org> References: <20121227004732.GB5854@waltdnes.org> <50DBA7D0.4060800@orlitzky.com> <87zk0zivjk.fsf@einstein.gmurray.org.uk> <20121227231150.GA9864@waltdnes.org> <50DCDEAF.9020002@orlitzky.com> <20121228035937.GA2949@waltdnes.org> <50DD370F.4070509@orlitzky.com> <20121229024605.GB5340@waltdnes.org> <50DE6A94.3060904@fastmail.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50DE6A94.3060904@fastmail.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 417837d0-4649-4d60-bc13-16d90dfa9f70 X-Archives-Hash: 5799e38b198c96f52b89318ae4f9b3b6 Two questions I'm not sure about. 1) I run a desktop, and use passive ftp. Is there any need for me to accept RELATED packets? 2) Does a "-j LOG" return to the chain it was called from, or does it do an implicit DROP? -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications