From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143813-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B711393A3 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4211C21C061; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C906021C00D for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08E0E80039 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:15:29 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:15:23 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? Message-ID: <20121225211523.4b27426e@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <50D9107E.8070406@gmail.com> References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com> <50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com> <CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <CAG2nJkNDLDp2hkz34XXEen4SO1_Mm18G8NNDMZK6tqDr+ddWtA@mail.gmail.com> <20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com> <CA+czFiD+Yv_PXctATd6EYws8kpqb3WFesLZU47jMN5ZJmy3oww@mail.gmail.com> <20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com> <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com> <50D85167.9060309@gmail.com> <20121224204817.335033c6@khamul.example.com> <50D8B467.4080100@gmail.com> <CAK2H+efOgw=gjMd-7b5ftH9KtgehBXcHRiAm4w1x6p5-vry4uQ@mail.gmail.com> <50D8D8D6.8090701@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecoTndDLxS5S4oybhUjkdD8fkCypV-kAjzV9Q7zZPSGYg@mail.gmail.com> <50D9107E.8070406@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0cvs51 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Mm7=Ak4lXP_phz.zg2Hel=5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6962cd55-294c-46d1-8366-6c0fb7a56be9 X-Archives-Hash: d3726cdf4214d3b5961cbc0acf13e12f --Sig_/Mm7=Ak4lXP_phz.zg2Hel=5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote: > Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a > good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is > going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on > this list and elsewhere.=20 I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no guarantees. --=20 Neil Bothwick We never really grow up; we only learn how to act in public. --Sig_/Mm7=Ak4lXP_phz.zg2Hel=5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDaF3AACgkQum4al0N1GQNkNwCg1ftLwk4FNbfwpUsJqdaW8C9k uJQAoJuzoMca7Ffh3sy06ATOnrZunYw1 =O8y0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Mm7=Ak4lXP_phz.zg2Hel=5--