From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D975E1381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F87B21C00F; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED87621C00F for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e12so1671878wge.10 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:41:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=6d62u9blglNZvT204bCXKdAfUH5U7dUxkHOHKmh8Kvk=; b=KwwXQx3df6EyxBPQ2tLnTTqxstbyJBUuObEa43ckzCAEY4SGs5mmp4EZEf40gBEVpV wsn+1PuMhihiFEQsKDSb56zbVysRdCquAuvs+hBejwVRHDmzvvc3y6NtgMW9dBw5Zuk+ go5IMhrtGzrcIhyoCdPWq0NrBR3ZKMJPOIFZylSedTx4Ox6fUG660eOF/ueVPvNnEAz5 aKGV0mcrOols4rM3NAu+ULJPijESEDkHT6ZFE23ejPXDzND24IJ+YtqB1twbkKoYWiOv HE9aX/1Jc8Lb35w5rkphdOFxisftFPr6jXOcZ6dEV83tsiS1EJgzslEY2qSog8CqnAke 7XNw== Received: by 10.180.87.225 with SMTP id bb1mr5297274wib.20.1355532071585; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u6sm43611wif.2.2012.12.14.16.41.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:41:10 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dual or Quad CPU complications? Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:40:52 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.7-gentoo; KDE/4.9.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <79c93dd8-3144-4e0b-906b-e46f303641cd@email.android.com> <20121213141356.GS8486@server> In-Reply-To: <20121213141356.GS8486@server> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4537412.7dQkUoXhE4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212150041.04754.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: feffe048-d8a3-4630-9a34-0dba2ae17b16 X-Archives-Hash: f7c3013a45f4f9ff93696192f25bfe0b --nextPart4537412.7dQkUoXhE4 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 13 Dec 2012 14:13:56 Bruce Hill wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:44:45AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > NUMA is also an option in the kernel. Should also be fully transparent. > > I got one machine with NUMA and only had to set an option for it. > >=20 > > Does anyone know how to check it's working properly? >=20 > dmesg | grep NUMA Hmm ... it seems that it can't find NUMA configuration: $ dmesg | grep UMA No NUMA configuration found Am I supposed to configure something in userspace? This is what the kernel= =20 has: $ uname -a Linux dell_xps 3.5.7-gentoo #2 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 26 10:36:47 GMT 2012 x86= _64=20 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i NUMA CONFIG_NUMA=3Dy # CONFIG_AMD_NUMA is not set CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=3Dy # CONFIG_NUMA_EMU is not set CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID=3Dy CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=3Dy =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4537412.7dQkUoXhE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlDLxyAACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZSaACg6srHLKQcwktuYv+qcToZLIVr 4ZQAoMF+J52a4t5i8iwbE2M01DnMFB1H =ESTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4537412.7dQkUoXhE4--