From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1EB1381F3 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7108521C019; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF999E068C for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F056E80B06 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:06:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:06:25 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags Message-ID: <20121213080625.649dc5ba@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <50C8C1AF.4010506@binarywings.net> References: <20121211173647.GA32351@eisen.lan> <50C795A7.4070501@binarywings.net> <20121212013939.GA16176@nukleus.lan> <50C83D7A.5020403@binarywings.net> <20121212094002.72180743@digimed.co.uk> <50C8C1AF.4010506@binarywings.net> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0cvs45 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/QHi.wttL6N7binc8X/zEyLa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 73398d6f-dc0b-4c51-868f-0fa9ee637c6f X-Archives-Hash: 0fe4114b372258008118b9ac5a060deb --Sig_/QHi.wttL6N7binc8X/zEyLa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:41:03 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: > >> I personally see no reason for encrypting root as there is nothing of > >> interest in there. =20 > >=20 > > No passwords in /etc? The main reason I encrypt / is that wicd keeps > > its passwords in /etc. > > =20 >=20 > I substitute with symlinks to /var/lib/*, /srv/* or similar. I used to do that, although I linked to /home/etc, but I found myself adding more and more and worried about missing something important. So I decided to learn how to create an initramfs and now have all but /boot (and sometimes /usr) encrypted. --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 5: Twelve-ounce pound cake --Sig_/QHi.wttL6N7binc8X/zEyLa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDJjIsACgkQum4al0N1GQNGMQCfXRxTrFxiKr41QJoY1/+g9dD6 gIMAn0ry1D202sQSMOotLnQsPj+xmyfG =4Srw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QHi.wttL6N7binc8X/zEyLa--