From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143286-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782AC1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC1D121C094;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B8B21C08A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133])
	by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MO6v6-1ToHUe1bdM-006EOB; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:03:33 -0500
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:31 -0600
From: Bruce Hill <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge sets syntax (@world vs. world)
Message-ID: <20121212150331.GX8486@server>
References: <1355313181.4605.140661165059833.3797A1E2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1355313181.4605.140661165059833.3797A1E2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:L7f8i5YbGyG4AmHuR33cR5i33W3gszoK3SfxO+Za4NI
 LaIgJEFF8v5zcpc7YzNp0IErtNvVFTKVlL86pv5yEG5BQZPhC/
 JbmIBYiS/FHIti9Gla2L0/XVX5Jd48fjWhOImbhd6+u1QheU07
 8o3AJeNJ/Kt7mZrj8GoHxHDET4KThcRc1ueqpdQNHjs9EI0ghK
 KJQjjzzGtqeEd2MCdGGe8WzJGy6JTU23jGxj6icFFRSr7VaR07
 PNCSgzmhypy+JJWRIbNtCIt1Vyt3SFn5ZD5Vi/Fqw1B6t/sVUs
 ZAHx415aWOK52mwmTvix4JoahJSFpcSfFSyX9WDZKAA9TXur0P
 dEFzkeVa8jaZ7NMl17io=
X-Archives-Salt: 9f77c225-e6aa-439d-ad95-2a3b8f4841f8
X-Archives-Hash: d5c8430d74fb53dda8585527ce203b98

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:53:01PM +0100, Francesco Turco wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> A couple of weeks ago I filed a bug because in the Installation Handbook
> I found some references of the "world" set in emerge commands, as
> opposed to "@world": https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445184
> 
> The bug was closed as invalid, and I was told that:
> 
> > sets with the @ prefix are a portage-2.2 feature, which is still hardmasked and thus not documented.
> 
> The fact is that I have portage-2.1.11.37, not 2.2, and man emerge says:
> 
> > When used  as  arguments to emerge sets have to be prefixed with @ to be recognized.
> 
> One possibility is that documentation stick with the stable portage
> package, not the testing one (I have a ~amd64 system only). But I
> checked portage 2.1.11.31 (the latest stable amd64 portage package
> version) and the previous phrase is there, too.
> 
> I know it's not a very important issue, but I'd still like to know if
> I'm wrong or not, and why.

Is there even a valid world set in portage before 2.2?

mingdao@server ~ $ eshowkw portage
Keywords for sys-apps/portage:
               |                           | u   |  
               | a a             p     s   | n   |  
               | l m   h i m m   p s   p   | u s | r
               | p d a p a 6 i p c 3   a x | s l | e
               | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
               | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
---------------+---------------------------+-----+-------
 [M]2.1.6.7_p1 | + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + | # 0 | gentoo
      2.1.11.9 | + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + | #   | gentoo
  [I]2.1.11.31 | + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + | o   | gentoo
     2.1.11.33 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | #   | gentoo
     2.1.11.36 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | #   | gentoo
     2.1.11.37 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | o   | gentoo
2.2.0_alpha142 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | #   | gentoo
2.2.0_alpha144 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | #   | gentoo
2.2.0_alpha147 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | #   | gentoo
2.2.0_alpha148 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o   | gentoo
          9999 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o   | gentoo
mingdao@server ~ $ ls -al /var/lib/portage/
total 12
drwxr-sr-x  2 root portage   78 Dec 12 08:10 .
drwxr-xr-x 11 root root     152 Oct 20 22:25 ..
-rw-rw----  1 root portage 8076 Nov 21 07:26 config
-rw-rw----  1 root portage    0 Nov  6 08:03 preserved_libs_registry
-rw-r--r--  1 root portage 1122 Dec  6 14:51 world
-rw-r--r--  1 root portage    0 Dec  6 14:51 world_sets

Might be why @preserved-rebuild never does anything for me, also.
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers               >')
126 Fenco Drive                       ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801                       ^^
support@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting