From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143110-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E156F1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Dec 2012 17:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4450F21C033;
	Fri,  7 Dec 2012 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A43121C02A;
	Fri,  7 Dec 2012 16:58:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm2so438238wib.10
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:58:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=4USLi/zpMVmFkuRkKUHigYVtprIlxu7Min2pljcCDKM=;
        b=YAH5+rJhMQ2qqtxw3mZidwTmziJ8YT0nYPPzYxSCt8b2r/0/rQxTfF5cUY89VO2IPv
         vsE0xdNzxwS9s3GZOKsJMPlFB+DoxhES1ptNB2gPga02TR22VfmeKjHGQJ4iz0U3JoiY
         vvJpEevQFms4hj/Oi8Ts5Bb07KriIF+FPmI8vSjwHLf1S5Flo6Zk80jkBfExfxuC9+ww
         mUciDEbIClOLJ/Dyda8NmcasifKu/akWKxiJvkRWGI78yWugzLVDD9bEq0tPkv1GYgXl
         2WRCQ5BkUnEuHkGEHyHynRruBg9mTsRDeWEniip/wxOmanV6IVAL67mZ08riuZQkI5BO
         OZzQ==
Received: by 10.180.95.169 with SMTP id dl9mr16083068wib.20.1354899505693;
        Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:58:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en20sm16406502wid.4.2012.12.07.08.58.23
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:58:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>,
 gentoo users <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>,
 qa@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:58:00 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.7-gentoo; KDE/4.9.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <20121207152454.GA3540@linux1> <20121207164127.GA4358@linux1>
In-Reply-To: <20121207164127.GA4358@linux1>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2714754.QpZaeA0uRG";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201212071658.21431.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 8abe3924-eeaf-4e27-b613-4ec5603da973
X-Archives-Hash: 688ad1c557125c9f1802293313d11773

--nextPart2714754.QpZaeA0uRG
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday 07 Dec 2012 16:41:27 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
> >=20
> > The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
> > way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
> > openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.
> >=20
> > There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize
> > 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng.
> >=20
> > When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to  fix
> > those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable
> > directly on some arch's arch's.
> >=20
> > wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and
> > we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go
> > stable. Please bear with me on this.
>=20
> Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you
> should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full
> responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC
> team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for
> your patience.
>=20
> William

Still with 0.11.7 until 0.11.8 reaches the mirrors and noticed a long list =
of,=20
e.g.:

rm: cannot remove '/lib/rc/init.d/softscripts/consolefont': Read-only file=
=20
system

with the init.d services.  These messages show up straight after:

* /run/lock: creating directory
* /run/lock: correcting owner

I have not noticed anything wrong as a result of these messages with my sys=
tem=20
on 2 boxen so far, i.e. services have started and are running normally.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick

--nextPart2714754.QpZaeA0uRG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlDCICwACgkQVTDTR3kpaLaIGQCfYf1selMrP3M1U2QZdBqeCvxB
I/cAn0ivw4yYWoZGiPi/lpF/jGt5kIh8
=NlH3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2714754.QpZaeA0uRG--