From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143109-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C502F1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8C6BE00D3;
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ye0-f181.google.com (mail-ye0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D223FE0539;
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ye0-f181.google.com with SMTP id m11so110321yen.40
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:41:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=/ghIK3gRUiwr4/KQXa7O3e472C7O03uSIt3+Bg7Tiwg=;
b=BrpQ5Zaklp2Qqd1IU/4VslwYWEhTsI28SjS4k9vDXKNFkcJ4LrlE8f+YFe3tEIaL/T
aDpAp8Px+//2YMCeDclNQHdHBa/rzwwcfljInyNJ9BJQoTLUXHCnc1jPPWXgHNeZ1ZhX
aW0FAV+pgCto6tWgbUQ21Mu7EH7PhGYMzeviT/yltiVTVzbdVhP1nMgRnMLzc0ThQUgi
TnYvjslyp6JWYlj5m+ZPbBikm4jN2Vrd625VeDHIaaTVmdbctzZPwjX7IDXO6MXY9nRC
dN9tupqqSHcCJBOz9x2FFNLCJRHzI+ga71o3vzJoGLF6zfQ/5Q5QX6qccmhkrhfywc7n
OnIQ==
Received: by 10.100.238.20 with SMTP id l20mr2400606anh.79.1354898491715;
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-94-64.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.94.64])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o66sm14085300yhi.19.2012.12.07.08.41.27
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:41:27 -0600
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:41:27 -0600
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo users <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>, qa@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes
Message-ID: <20121207164127.GA4358@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>,
gentoo users <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>, qa@gentoo.org
References: <20121207152454.GA3540@linux1>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121207152454.GA3540@linux1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: fad6714f-16f0-4be1-80bc-fcfeda114d1a
X-Archives-Hash: c47fe5426622365a06cd37661232f987
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
>=20
> The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
> way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
> openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.
>=20
> There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize
> 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng.
>=20
> When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to fix
> those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable
> directly on some arch's arch's.
>=20
> wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and
> we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go
> stable. Please bear with me on this.
Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you
should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full
responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC
team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for
your patience.
William
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlDCHDcACgkQblQW9DDEZThgpACeOTU35nerTmglOeEyG4eoona+
pm0An33yL60RD53JTiz33dck7B72ffn6
=yplp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--