From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCBC1381F3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0343E05EB; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8067CE059C for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u54so3566692wey.40 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:45:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=awrU91mgpD5IzjkgRFmLmFE3EPAvw9jHLuXBfIQzYsY=; b=DREWjEhIiwzuPZ7MbbD1YBHvQyC/5EuAZrd6MEBRR9qnCVBbp78ZeYRWkBqIpWdY/R dnCvUr7U6rrsmOZ1ma9l6axBmGKAjNUrPgF3m54KW0bmrFzqDtTpL80F5P3F+38t4RIz 0e8NjkC9BPN6vysT7BoKGoxyr9HhA+CiusXeI6egl7Rr+7gVrtZ7UiHs6vb/wRoORdxn ZopP2J53lRSnnU8YpIXwyFeGRnluZzv2p8eBR8pFO0MitCIzpZbsXPGx4jjFzAA5fb8C B3VKQr3d6XloXlR8M38YwdZludtxZnGeAhIYv2QbiC30JYOi7WYFnkGcnrMQHWtjyJor Cbqg== Received: by 10.216.220.78 with SMTP id n56mr865176wep.135.1352846751139; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from khamul.example.com (196-210-100-105.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.100.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hv4sm20790559wib.0.2012.11.13.14.45.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:45:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:43:20 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [ANNOUNCE] I like systemd now :) Message-ID: <20121114004320.26f7b211@khamul.example.com> In-Reply-To: <20121113214511.GW17663@server> References: <20121112102019.4b164b44@khamul.example.com> <1577100.BvvtX0R6Vv@energy> <20121113222618.9c3743c91c4b29dee6df0e5c@gmail.com> <20121113214511.GW17663@server> Organization: Internet Solutions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 098a2f43-8ecf-4c97-b4f3-e54179d5a29f X-Archives-Hash: 31b9128cc10fa73bad4c4c5996d64184 On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:45:11 -0600 Bruce Hill wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:26:18PM +0100, Cr0k wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > Can't you answer correctly to the mailing lists? Each one of your > > mails goes into my standard Mailbox, while I did a rule to make it > > goes to a gentoo-user folder... > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Cr0k > > Can you learn to trim? ;) > > What is the problem? You need to be a bit more specific. Here we go again, this one comes up about once a year :-) It's the tired old "Reply-To munging considered harmful" vs "Reply-To munging considered harmful - the opposing view" debate. Canek replied to sender with cc: to the list whereas list mails have Reply-To set to the list, so he's in the latter category. Personally I prefer the former, but there's no easy solution and no sane default either (both views have equal pros and cons IMHO) The solution I recommend to folks is to bypass the entire problem altogether as senders are free to address their mails however they like and resist being told how to do it different to suit someone else (especially 3rd parties) I filter by List-* header, which is rather reliable. As opposed to using To: and From: and all those other unreliable things. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com