From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-141169-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B04138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D70221C005;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mercure.logifi.fr (mercure.logifi.fr [217.108.178.220])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81578E05F2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercure.logifi.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2445F443C3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mercure.logifi.fr
Received: from mercure.logifi.fr ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mercure.logifi.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id iWwUnG-eRruf; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nicolas-desktop (unknown [192.168.8.78])
	by mercure.logifi.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62459443C1;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:32:21 +0200
From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@piing.fr>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@piing.fr>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: aligning SSD partitions
Message-ID: <20120910103221.GA5984@nicolas-desktop>
References: <20120906134646.GH2442@nicolas-desktop>
 <5048B120.2030905@gmail.com>
 <CAEH5T2OU5K0marMrt6Y0gFJqK+iz2mgyhU5LXtXV4JGjJQ5HQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5048D2D7.1070000@gmail.com>
 <20120906212107.6d7dcc64@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
 <504910F8.5010205@gmail.com>
 <20120906233845.65eb840f@digimed.co.uk>
 <50492D07.6090004@gmail.com>
 <20120907074722.GA2419@nicolas-desktop>
 <5049EA16.3080002@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5049EA16.3080002@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Archives-Salt: aa09cf55-6d5b-470f-945e-5d0df6fe7c21
X-Archives-Hash: 186cdfffdba094972928ab4df5082c3b

The 07/09/12, Dale wrote:

> The thing is tho, whether it is using the memory as cache or using it
> as
> tmpfs, it is the same memory.  There is no difference.  That's the
> whole
> point. 

Feel free to take your own assumptions as undeniable truth. The way the
kernel work with memory is the key, of course.

Now, as long as you blind yourself with statements like that, I'm not
going to respond anymore. I guess you need to make some basic research.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht