From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-141076-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DD5138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  6 Sep 2012 20:24:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CA6721C03C;
	Thu,  6 Sep 2012 20:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B49E077C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  6 Sep 2012 20:21:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C07A18007A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  6 Sep 2012 21:21:19 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:21:19 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: aligning SSD partitions
Message-ID: <20120906212119.2a2bbacd@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5048D029.6010100@gmail.com>
References: <50474B1D.8070306@gmail.com>
	<20120905161743.1f2ecd9d@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<CA+czFiB6xEVvthmhdtFNxrtwDEQa4XgTBMK9_qyVZXZi-Q+O1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<504791EB.2030103@gmail.com>
	<20120906065755.GA2442@nicolas-desktop>
	<504869AB.20908@gmail.com>
	<20120906104744.7f0972a7@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<504876B5.7050001@gmail.com>
	<20120906112003.7b1235bd@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<50487E9A.3060200@gmail.com>
	<20120906111136.GC2442@nicolas-desktop>
	<5048898C.7070301@gmail.com>
	<20120906131754.6d9fbcb1@digimed.co.uk>
	<50489BBB.5090702@gmail.com>
	<20120906140420.26a3e3c5@digimed.co.uk>
	<5048AE22.3020802@gmail.com>
	<20120906153743.31fdeb8a@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<5048D029.6010100@gmail.com>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1cvs44 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/Qnl2JrncPhSD0I=JJhGZElN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 06b6f68d-1fc6-4057-8260-e82765ac8de4
X-Archives-Hash: 52ef0eea4ac4741c5c061a9f46fe4f7a

--Sig_/Qnl2JrncPhSD0I=JJhGZElN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:32:41 -0500, Dale wrote:

> Others ran their own tests and got the same results.

No one is denying the results, only the reasons given for them.

--=20
Neil Bothwick

If you can't be kind, be vague.

--Sig_/Qnl2JrncPhSD0I=JJhGZElN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlBJBb8ACgkQum4al0N1GQObaACgxloW7/5MhUY4DguajaNYN1ft
YmEAn0vcYz8LNJnRH/D+xJxrpYSkX4yb
=ix3B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Qnl2JrncPhSD0I=JJhGZElN--