From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F6D138010 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3754221C019; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB90E07DF for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E630C6E20 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([77.75.108.10]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5hMGqe+36JF for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD5DC6E24 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:19 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] aligning SSD partitions Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.9-gentoo; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20120904072003.GD3095@ca.inter.net> <201209051023.52973.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <50473261.9040704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50473261.9040704@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209051225.18653.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2d8b92c1-1ebc-4a4a-af55-b1c63eb36265 X-Archives-Hash: 82beb0ec93ce517417070b4489c9fa99 On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:07:13 Dale wrote: > I might also add, I see no speed improvements in putting portages > work directory on tmpfs. I have tested this a few times and the > difference in compile times is just not there. Yes, I'd forgotten that. I just haven't got round to changing it. It works, so I haven't fixed it. :-) -- Rgds Peter