From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140775-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF94138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2189021C006;
	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9A4E068C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7040180032
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:10:33 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:10:28 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xz memory hungry?
Message-ID: <20120822221028.56de4594@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAKpSnpLENT8VRJdSh7Oq0M22gsZfB13tFsm4uoeet+3z_neVAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKpSnpKGcbSanF_DFWhU+Lk5r+0w6ug5+0FqqK_83F4w6SUb3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+czFiAukdRt+S5VoXbX-pep38aCZiSDNTS5XO+ZDV9YG4MzdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKpSnpLENT8VRJdSh7Oq0M22gsZfB13tFsm4uoeet+3z_neVAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1cvs33 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/Oh27CuMHxJhMrWyfajbNSJ="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 37b59c38-2f62-4d57-af2e-603faecbd08d
X-Archives-Hash: f6c6fd02cbb6b55a2709c9483d829bbf

--Sig_/Oh27CuMHxJhMrWyfajbNSJ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:32:56 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:

> Done that. It extracts now,  so 3) is the correct hypothesis, and
> "insane" is really the appropriate word. Of course, the hash digests
> are now wrong, so emerge still fails.

sudo ebuild $PORTDIR/cat/pkg/pkg-ver.ebuild manifest


--=20
Neil Bothwick

The computer revolution is over. The computers won.

--Sig_/Oh27CuMHxJhMrWyfajbNSJ=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlA1SskACgkQum4al0N1GQNQdQCgtenS1w0w4xanECo30PXSqSTR
nr0AmgPANxOFvNG578azwyFWD4u51ZdT
=QJMs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Oh27CuMHxJhMrWyfajbNSJ=--