From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140480-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577A913800E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Aug 2012 20:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9A0CE07CC;
	Thu,  9 Aug 2012 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.virtyou.com (mx.virtyou.com [178.33.32.244])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69ADE079D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Aug 2012 20:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from weird.wonkology.org (xdsl-84-44-153-89.netcologne.de [84.44.153.89])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx.virtyou.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABAF8DC04A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Aug 2012 22:36:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:36:33 +0200
From: Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
Message-ID: <20120809223633.19e5d049@weird.wonkology.org>
In-Reply-To: <k01606$ure$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <k01606$ure$1@dough.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 55d4ea69-cd94-48d0-a75e-62f2f70717c8
X-Archives-Hash: ba1942087aa6b8e88eb830ac0291291b

walt writes:

> This has been slow and painful so far.
> 
> First, the build stops repeatedly because of zero-length library files.
> I can restart the ebuild manually and each iteration builds one more
> (real) library.  I've been doing this iterating for hours and I think
> I may have gotten past that part, but the build is far from done...
> 
> Second, the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking
> much longer than before.  Ugh.
> 
> Anyone else seeing these problems?

No, I just built it today, in the usual time of about 2.5 hours.

	Wonko