From: Bryan Gardiner <bog@khumba.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Proper permissions for /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log?
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:27:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120624172716.3e05ac32@khumba.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE79941.7010700@gmail.com>
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:48:33 -0500
Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 19:27:36 Dale wrote:
> >> Jarry wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I have just checked my machines and I found I have basically
> >>> two groups of settings ("ls -al" in /var/log/portage/elog/):
> >>>
> >>> A)
> >>> drwxrws--- 2 portage root 4096 Jun 24 03:10 .
> >>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 2009 ..
> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 57760 Jun 22 15:11 summary.log
> >>>
> >>> B)
> >>> drwxrwsr-x 2 portage portage 4096 Jun 24 13:30 .
> >>> drwxrws--- 3 portage portage 4096 Nov 3 2011 ..
> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage portage 1132 Jun 22 17:28 summary.log
> >>>
> >>> Not only "summary.log", but also /var/log/portage/ and
> >>> /var/log/portage/elog/ have quite different permissions.
> >>> I'm sure I never changed it manually, the only difference
> >>> is that "A" group has been installed 3 yers ago, while "B"
> >>> just recently (but both regulary updated).
> >>>
> >>> So is the "B-version" correct one?
> >>>
> >>> Jarry
> >> This is my thinking on why it may be different for different folks.
> >> This first tho. I run emerge as root. I have not added my
> >> regular user to the portage group. I have no memory of messing
> >> with the permissions either.
> >>
> >> I think that if you use a regular user to emerge some things, it
> >> gets set to portage:portage or some mix of portage:root. If you
> >> always run emerge as root, then you get root:root. It may be that
> >> this is only set once or that it could be modified if you run as
> >> root then later on run as a user.
> >>
> >> For the record, mine is set to root:root. As mentioned above, I
> >> ALWAYS run emerge as root.
> >>
> >> Any one have thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Dale
> >>
> >> :-) :-)
> > I always run emerge as root.
> >
> > elog is owned by portage:root, summary.log within it as
> > portage:root, other log files within /var/log/portage are owned by
> > portage:portage.
>
> So those that allow users to run would have the same permissions as
> everyone else. Now I wonder why they vary from system to system
> then. It seems to me, they should be the same for everyone. Just
> seems odd.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
I generally "emerge -p" as user then "emerge" as root. For ownership
of /var/log/portage/elog, I tried changing my system with portage:root
to portage:portage and vice versa on the other system. Something
during right the merge phase, right around when those elog messages
appear, resets the ownership back to what is was before I changed it
on both systems. Odd indeed.
I thought perhaps some user flag in FEATURES would do this, but the
only difference between the two is buildpkg vs. buildsyspkg. The only
user FEATURE enabled is userfetch. Running portage-2.2.0_alpha112 on
both.
- Bryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-24 14:12 [gentoo-user] Proper permissions for /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log? Jarry
2012-06-24 15:19 ` Mick
2012-06-24 17:46 ` Bryan Gardiner
2012-06-24 18:27 ` Dale
2012-06-24 22:11 ` Mick
2012-06-24 22:48 ` Dale
2012-06-25 0:27 ` Bryan Gardiner [this message]
2012-06-25 3:26 ` Dale
2012-06-26 18:43 ` Tanstaafl
2012-06-25 18:19 ` Jarry
2012-06-25 22:20 ` Michael Mol
2012-06-26 6:56 ` Bryan Gardiner
2012-06-26 7:03 ` Bryan Gardiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120624172716.3e05ac32@khumba.net \
--to=bog@khumba.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox