From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:00:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621100046.182f8faa@khamul.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120621024708.GA11412@waltdnes.org>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:47:08 -0400
"Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:04:13AM -0700, walt wrote
>
> > I just did the same update. I thought at first everything was okay,
> > then I ran glxgears, which runs at 1/5 normal speed. Going back to
> > 295.59 fixed it. Very puzzling, since there was nothing unusual in
> > Xorg.0.log.
>
> What does glxgears prove anyways? With 295.59 I get 5300 fps, and
> 302.17 gives me 3 spf (yes... seconds per frame!!!). But Youtube, etc
> seems to function the same. So I'm wondering about the point of
> glxgears.
>
glx gears shows you that stuff works or not.
So it's a quick go-no go test, just not useful for measuring anything.
It's designed for the scenario where you want to judge relatively how
well things are working today video-wise. Now, you could run a 3D
rendering app, or play a video, or something like that and see how it
performs compared to the same thing yesterday. But those apps all do
many other things as well as drive the video card so you don't really
know what is influencing the mix.
With glxgears, all it does is drive the video and draw spinning gears,
nothing else. So if version X-1 yesterday worked fine and the video was
smooth, but version X today plays very jerkily, and nothing else
changed, then you know your system does not like version X.
It's a perfectly valid test, just don't trust the numbers - trust what
your eyes tell you.
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 5:19 [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4 Philip Webb
2012-06-15 11:42 ` microcai
2012-06-15 15:14 ` Philip Webb
2012-06-15 15:35 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-18 9:29 ` Philip Webb
2012-06-20 1:28 ` Walter Dnes
2012-06-20 14:04 ` walt
2012-06-20 14:46 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-21 19:47 ` walt
2012-06-22 12:30 ` walt
2012-06-22 16:45 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-21 2:47 ` Walter Dnes
2012-06-21 3:28 ` João Matos
2012-06-21 16:16 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-06-21 8:00 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2012-06-21 8:00 ` Daniel Troeder
2012-06-21 9:49 ` Philip Webb
2012-06-21 12:15 ` Hartmut Figge
2012-06-22 6:53 ` Walter Dnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120621100046.182f8faa@khamul.example.com \
--to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox