From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-139044-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SdLje-0001M6-PY
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:29:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56614E04D6;
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72083E00C2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1352614wer.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=hOyTboYSamZ1s/TqGB8Pkt9QcUy0Vqkax5U75rfyf90=;
b=aIEGxDuRnBWyrD+zqiAgqY/1r9Jgdc5p0BM0+k2g21f/jQtOBSlr7FaR/dBC5l0Obe
vEXIvE2vnSSgzaiHhNNiZtyfswKTvsiAXtuNZVn87tZYsgE2dIbaERtDMQ4GNnGDLQEa
vPnvgDCtcPXa1h/E/K/jm84Ow0S4dS2iert1R3hidULN9xpIrHe4QYLvAa4JGrzMD8FY
EeYR8mrcGBfFlG+XdPrXGcYBfew6PfIWs2a2WaBL/VJKBHuyapZNQyEAdeuNIX97O2hS
VY5BBjJklSQ1ZYqPcpOkmbz+F5NzVfJO8IKgSS6OQShMjStJrVrbhgsR+Lntd4O86jvf
xjoQ==
Received: by 10.216.211.8 with SMTP id v8mr2985172weo.176.1339248472389;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id db7sm9135375wib.6.2012.06.09.06.27.50
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Lockdown: free/open OS maker pays Microsoft ransom for the right to boot on users' computers
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 14:28:03 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoo; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <1338603963.12172.1.camel@moriah> <201206062040.34175.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <CA+czFiBU2Ck--Sw=BSQrQ2Q=go7b7K4=3VK8SqZajBYSt0AZVw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiBU2Ck--Sw=BSQrQ2Q=go7b7K4=3VK8SqZajBYSt0AZVw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1736648.hJ8M3C7RMT";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201206091428.13198.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: afe5c56d-9e3a-4228-8a86-5664db03c8a3
X-Archives-Hash: 091866538f568bec21d25cf91cfa5776
--nextPart1736648.hJ8M3C7RMT
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday 06 Jun 2012 20:50:38 Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> [snip]
>=20
> > This is my CPU, a first generation i7:
> >=20
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family : 6
> > model : 30
> > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz
> > stepping : 5
> > microcode : 0x4
> > cpu MHz : 933.000
> > cache size : 6144 KB
> > physical id : 0
> > siblings : 8
> > core id : 0
> > cpu cores : 4
> > apicid : 0
> > initial apicid : 0
> > fpu : yes
> > fpu_exception : yes
> > cpuid level : 11
> > wp : yes
> > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> > mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
> > syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl
> > xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est
> > tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow
> > vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 3192.11
> > clflush size : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >=20
> > You note that "power management:" above is empty.
> >=20
> > grep-ping the /proc tree for remoteaccess does not bring up anything.
>=20
> According to Intel's site, your processor has the vPro "feature" in it.
>=20
> http://ark.intel.com/products/43122/Intel-Core-i7-720QM-Processor-(6M-Cac=
he
> -1_60-GHz)
>=20
> Can you find the device you noticed under /sys?
No, nothing when I search for remote or remoteaccess or access ...
If this Intel AMT, or vPRO thingy is outside the MoBo chipset then it may n=
ot=20
get probed or be accessible by the kernel?
But then, how does lshw see it?
*-remoteaccess UNCLAIMED
vendor: Intel
physical id: 2
capabilities: outbound <--what does this mean? O_O
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart1736648.hJ8M3C7RMT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk/TT20ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbuYQCfflhKYwDhAML6KaPslpbeUAl3
IuAAmwXirOOdz/euITUwvHOfRU9Ld6Iy
=jAkf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1736648.hJ8M3C7RMT--