From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138838-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Sb28g-0005R8-S1
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:10:03 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11DEEE0486;
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:09:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71076E067D
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so1290391qab.11
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=2CBLWG7UnxVeceZvsNph2FZihSAykx/OQA0btpTboVk=;
b=gEKfKg/EdBW1rmTnvpvv4kQIfLqQxsFrAJyc1SntO1we7rWFBISwetnWjJkhM35Uo1
rgN0wuszAW7sCNrNjPSmz0keY1966q09RSzqZRycIHnac58zmcoIN/lnIdniaZ4LDXEo
z2Ag+PCkVI+U9L85BcTYco1aD+k/OUZfOWubiU14qEjy2YoG5tejml6oKWRIMvWeDFGE
FyNxcarW1/zIrdfcGWsxiFz5E//64vpCNeU7fjMmwB58RtOFUjxCNPRTuiI9D8VrsJDf
aF2m+MVVbaZXpOkdWGphuxnKj0DXdVGHl+Eo2aV6b7pW2QTcDRk4dCDspF32lrziUYs6
yiLQ==
Received: by 10.229.135.82 with SMTP id m18mr2450539qct.80.1338696497783;
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from madrid (ool-4577acae.dyn.optonline.net. [69.119.172.174])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dk2sm11525665qab.14.2012.06.02.21.08.16
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Dmitry Goncharov <gonch.dmitry@gmail.com>
Received: by madrid (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:08:15 -0400
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 00:08:15 -0400
From: Dmitry Goncharov <dgoncharov@users.sf.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3
is a stinker.
Message-ID: <20120603040814.GD12597@madrid>
References: <CA+czFiAsW0+7=4zFjekZjyTPX8kAVLx1g5OSXqDsGBV8Pke6FA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC=wYCG0Nfh1zth+ZNpD464gM2E+fJ-UXQtA6r+Ex3vOFjAb7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiCcVi54B6dgvmzqcR-HMWTFumjXnsvm8bp9wvtOmaRomg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGXffqw4gpY1UpKJbM_VghX0XRrEybyXtmc33LksVpUU-w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiC5ZEo3k0hnFVpL4P6dUeYRB9sX6CRmm4CTAwKP-m_VGA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGXHaEA8khehqTbpNrqnJaWAqhbdOq67VQ-2fc2Wceo=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiAaxkGRY-6dsj_7BRL+xarrxAwr3bR3C4eNeRqCx0fv=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiCuQPJVWo7LpnfaD6zr4WAaOnTGL9TCQeYmnvYhk6tZrQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120603033410.GC12597@madrid>
<CA+czFiB3nvcUTUh7-LRapQ0v_OHWTnL=S=AY5k__XYNXvvO0Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiB3nvcUTUh7-LRapQ0v_OHWTnL=S=AY5k__XYNXvvO0Cw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 8109c77e-3f08-4a33-8faf-269c7c6c0205
X-Archives-Hash: bd1a6dd909e3b0f20be749d21d585845
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:56:01PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov
> <dgoncharov@users.sf.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
> >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible.
> >>
> >> This is repeatable for me.
> >>
> > <snip>
> >> =A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named
> >> =A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys-
> >>
> > <snip>
> >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msa=
hf
> >> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param
> >> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3"
> >> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}"
> >
> > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15?
>=20
> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall.
>=20
> > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if=
the
> > problem persists?
>=20
> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to:
> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative".
>=20
> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative.
>=20
> > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you =
can build
> > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass.
>=20
> If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline
> for almost two months from this.
>=20
> --=20
> :wq
>=20
Also, which gcc are you using? Can you try a different version?
regards, Dmitry