public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Scherer <a6702894@unet.univie.ac.at>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 04:10:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523041021.5cef3c03@unet.univie.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120517225941.6e5eec49@weird.wonkology.org>

On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:59:41 +0200
Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote:

> Michael Scherer writes:
> 
> > 1) make output:
> > 
> >   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> >   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
> >   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> >   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
> >   LD      init/mounts.o
> > ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
> > init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
> > make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [init] Error 2
> > 
> > There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
> 
> But the options look really more like ld options to me. How this could
> possibly happen, I don't know. Some overriding of $(LD) perhaps? Does
> "env | egrep -i 'ls|ld'" show something weird? Does it also fail as a
> non-root user, after you copied the stuff over to somewhere where this
> user can write? Just grasping at straws here.
> 
> 
> > But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
> > whatever reason.
> 
> Because ld should build it from init/do_mounts.o, but ls is being
> called instead?
> 
> > The build command
> > 
> > init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
> > -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
> > -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
> > -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
> > -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
> > -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
> > -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
> > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> > -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security
> > -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone
> > -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args
> > -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1
> > -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe
> > -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx
> > -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -Wframe-larger-than=2048
> > -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > -fno-inline-functions-called-once -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack
> > -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=\#s"
> > -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)"
> > -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts)" -c -o init/do_mounts.o
> > init/do_mounts.c
> > 
> > contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but
> > it for some reason this is ignored.
> > Maybe there is a flaw in that command, only I can't find it.
> 
> Neither can I. Is this command executed at all? If you maybe replace
> the 'gcc' by 'gccXXX', does this give an error? Or put an 'echo' in
> front of the gcc'.
> You can try 'make -d', this will give you LOTS of debug output, but I
> don't think you will see the actual commands then.
> 
> 	Wonko
> 

Now at last there is some kind of "progress". Last thing I tried was
replacing my current .config with that of my previous kernel (3.2.1-r2)
and at least the make ran all the way up to the point where it should
link everything to build vmlinux, only now it tells me it couldn't
find vmlinux.o.

The last couple of lines from the make output:

  CC      arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/msr.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
  LD      arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.o arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o arch/x86/lib/msr.o
arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/clear_page_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.o
  AS	  arch/x86/lib/copy_page_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/copy_user_nocache_64.o
  AS	  arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/delay.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/getuser.o
  GEN     arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c
  CC      arch/x86/lib/inat.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/insn.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/memset_64.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/putuser.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/rwlock.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/rwsem.o
  AS      arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/usercopy.o
  CC      arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.o
  AR      arch/x86/lib/lib.a
  LD      vmlinux.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o vmlinux.o arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
arch/x86/kernel/head64.o arch/x86/kernel/head.o
arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o --start-group
usr/built-in.o arch/x86/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o
fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o
block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a lib/built-in.o
arch/x86/lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o
firmware/built-in.o arch/x86/pci/built-in.o arch/x86/power/built-in.o
arch/x86/video/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group
 MODPOST vmlinux.o
  vmlinux.o: No such file or directory make[1]: ***
  [vmlinux.o] Error 1 make: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 2


Essentially the same error as previously with mounts.o, and after
every LD comes an ls -Al ... line like above, which I never saw
before in my make outputs. Don't know where that comes from.

I'm now back where the troubles began, the vmlinux.o error was
the first I encountered after my last successful build.
Maybe a careful search of a diff of the .config files will
give me some idea.

By now you're probably somewhat tired of devoting your time
to this problem, so thank you for all your efforts to help me.
If I ever solve this, you'll hear from me (which doesn't mean
the thread is closed. If someone is still curious... ;-) )

Kind regards, Michael



  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-23  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09  8:47 [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Dale
2012-05-09  9:25 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09  9:52   ` Dale
2012-05-09 11:32     ` Daniel Troeder
2012-05-09 11:51       ` Dale
2012-05-10 19:39         ` David Haller
2012-05-09 21:28     ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09 22:24       ` Dale
2012-05-09 22:48         ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-09 23:49           ` Dale
2012-05-10  1:39             ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-10  1:52               ` Adam Carter
2012-05-10 12:53             ` Todd Goodman
2012-05-09 23:37         ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 23:58           ` Dale
2012-05-10  7:03             ` Mick
2012-05-10 11:55             ` napalm
2012-05-10 12:38               ` Dale
2012-05-10 13:27                 ` napalm
2012-05-10 21:39                   ` Dale
2012-05-10 22:53               ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-11  0:07                 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-11  1:10                   ` David Haller
2012-05-10 19:38   ` David Haller
2012-05-10 21:13     ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09 11:47 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-09 12:06   ` mike
2012-05-09 13:30     ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-09 12:29   ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 16:39     ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-09 17:28       ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 18:42         ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-09 18:53           ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-10 14:20       ` [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer
2012-05-10 14:50         ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-10 19:57           ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-10 21:08         ` Stroller
2012-05-11  1:01           ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11  5:18             ` Joshua Murphy
2012-05-11 12:59               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11 17:56               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11 10:20             ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-11 22:48         ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-05-12  1:31           ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-12 18:17         ` walt
2012-05-14  1:44           ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-14  2:13             ` ny6p01
2012-05-14 15:26               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-14 15:37                 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 15:52                 ` ny6p01
2012-05-26 11:18                   ` luis jure
2012-05-26 13:56                     ` ny6p01
2012-05-14 16:13                 ` Allan Gottlieb
2012-05-14 17:13                   ` Dale
2012-05-14 20:54                     ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-15  0:46                       ` Dale
2012-05-15 17:01                         ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-15 17:15                           ` Dale
2012-05-15 21:12                           ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-18 12:29                           ` Willie WY Wong
2012-05-15 17:25                         ` john
2012-05-15 23:26                           ` Peter Humphrey
2012-05-16  0:41                         ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-17 16:14                           ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:05                             ` Dale
2012-05-17 19:13                               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:13                             ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-17 18:58                               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:47                             ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-17 19:14                               ` ny6p01
2012-05-17 19:25                                 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-17 23:56                                   ` Peter Humphrey
2012-05-17 19:29                               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 21:10                               ` Michael Mol
2012-05-17 18:06                             ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-17 20:13                               ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:50                                 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2012-05-21  3:24                                   ` Joshua Murphy
2012-07-03 11:11                                     ` [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails [SOLVED] Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:51                                 ` [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:59                                 ` Alex Schuster
2012-05-23  2:10                                   ` Michael Scherer [this message]
2012-05-23  6:05                                     ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-19  3:18                         ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-19 16:59                           ` Arttu V.
2012-05-26 11:33                       ` luis jure
2012-05-14 18:25                 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-14 19:11                   ` Alecks Gates
2012-05-14 19:23                     ` Michael Mol
2012-05-15  0:03                       ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-15  0:05                         ` Alecks Gates
2012-05-15  0:16                           ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-14 20:51                     ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 21:01                       ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 21:24                         ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 21:53                           ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-14 23:23                             ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 23:35                               ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 23:26                             ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 23:55                     ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-14 21:56                 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-09 13:15 ` [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-09 22:37   ` Dale
2012-05-10 16:20 ` Norman Invasion
2012-05-10 18:01   ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-10 18:13     ` Norman Invasion
2012-05-10 18:51       ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-12  9:34         ` Mick
2012-05-12  9:49           ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-13  9:35           ` David Haller
2012-05-10 19:24     ` David Haller
2012-05-11  1:15   ` Bill Kenworthy
2012-05-12 18:50   ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-05-13  9:38     ` David Haller
2012-05-21 21:05       ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-05-21 22:44         ` Andrew Hoffman
2012-05-10 19:36 ` David Haller
2012-05-10 21:25   ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-10 20:17 ` Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120523041021.5cef3c03@unet.univie.ac.at \
    --to=a6702894@unet.univie.ac.at \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox