From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SWGal-0005Jb-HW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 00:35:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9A1E09EA; Mon, 21 May 2012 00:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E40FE09EA for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 00:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3722B2EA07D for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb1p9nnb2RKT for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ca.inter.net (host-208-72-125-241.dyn.295.ca [208.72.125.241]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E0272EA058 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ca.inter.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:39 -0400 From: Philip Webb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together Message-ID: <20120521003339.GA2980@ca.inter.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120512132257.GA2968@ca.inter.net> <20120515025033.GB2969@ca.inter.net> <20120517043419.GC2965@ca.inter.net> <20120519043828.GB2989@ca.inter.net> <4613CE50-114F-4B8D-BBC1-188F6D30BC21@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 760a777b-ad98-438e-8ed5-08c0dbbc2833 X-Archives-Hash: 1c685116d594ad7123c797a2042ab075 120520 Michael Mol wrote: > as Philip later remarked, it turns out the lens was likely a 75mm prime The picture of the camera looks exactly what I remember, tho' there might have been different models with different lenses. It was a very good camera for its time. > The leftmost portion will never look all that great, > as he captured the Sun setting behind a building > or maybe that's a water spot The Sun was indeed setting to the left at that time + date, but the bluish blemish is some sort of physical decay in the negative, which was stored in a cardboard box for c 55 yr without being touched. > If these source JPG files are scans of paper photos No, they're 2 overlapping scans of the same negative, whose size is 58 x 43 mm = 2,3 x 1,7 inch . > Anyway, the final Hugin pto file is here: http://pastebin.com/gudxvAEa What is a 'pto' file ? -- I downloaded it & it's text. > And the final stitch is here: > http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ? -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca