From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SVAaK-0000Pz-7a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:58:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 370F2E0B9F; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AF3E07E2 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29131C6E0E for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:56:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbDE6eVgvaNN for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:56:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3DBC6E0C for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 00:56:36 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:56:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoo; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <20120517191407.GA9703@badass.gateway.2wire.net> <20120517212501.34b732a4@khamul.example.com> In-Reply-To: <20120517212501.34b732a4@khamul.example.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205180056.36212.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 511f847f-e437-437e-98f5-c1af2133f555 X-Archives-Hash: 3516cf8799440e440e6e73392b3f3b4e On Thursday 17 May 2012 20:25:01 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Outlook Express? Not even MS would attach the label "flagship" to > Outlook Express. A recent experience has suggested a reason for OE to work the way it does. Using it the way it's designed to be used, the entire conversation so far is included in every message; this will save mucho casho for those organisations that don't want to store e-mails - they rely on being able to scan an incoming e-mail to find out what it's all about. Not an efficient use of bandwidth. In fact it's an abuse of network operators to relieve user companies of their responsibilities. -- Rgds Peter