From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138216-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1ST93C-0004Ql-7p
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:55:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4833DE0A59;
Sat, 12 May 2012 09:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA42E09C4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:53:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1450975wer.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=LoAW3rq6NMcjzeepc6gIG5+Qu8Tl8z4wzajEymreoMc=;
b=LyRGPPix30X9Sf0thonMXiNZDbAWJuddh5ESrq06U3M6vphE/0PL5z4eezCfDOAedk
NMOzmiKf/8PymGFHjsXFOdZdqDBpCLg0MW6QDGsBhdfwpn+4K+Whn7W6bdrAmJc8S0Hk
3j4esLCneTKzwISbgWQLAv8wZgD9P87uysH9BZSNVge80KgWZeM56ZIJTDFm+Ai6OEjZ
ODml8+xwGGccUbCVx85iiIVDkVpPJDkhQOk+86Yh7J5iPIYotL0KqH+gxwUMv6OgHGYU
AJ32aSnEPdgTK/xGkooARAyFR5n2Cjo7JyXh4DLl8mk5w9RJBxvu4jU/dsrIgj3LnOpC
JKdw==
Received: by 10.180.75.241 with SMTP id f17mr3138035wiw.11.1336816390259;
Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fn2sm27840067wib.0.2012.05.12.02.53.08
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What to use for Flash?
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:53:26 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoo; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; ; )
References: <4FABAAE7.8000509@gmail.com> <201205110808.06274.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4FADBA10.9030903@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FADBA10.9030903@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1382252.vOuaMMzXRP";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201205121053.27686.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 57778a88-eb6c-4f5a-9f3c-e5042bdb931e
X-Archives-Hash: 0b424cb38f4a7a444c7f805711f2f3fe
--nextPart1382252.vOuaMMzXRP
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday 12 May 2012 02:17:04 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > The latest stable www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235 includes the
> > sse2check flag and warnings about it - I take it that you have taken hid
> > of these?
> >=20
> > $ euse -i sse2check
> > global use flags (searching: sse2check)
> > ************************************************************
> > no matching entries found
> >=20
> > local use flags (searching: sse2check)
> > ************************************************************
> > [- ] sse2check
> >=20
> > www-plugins/adobe-flash: This flag, enabled by default, will check
> > for sse2 support on your cpu and die if not found. If you are
> > remote-building this package, you can disable this flag but you have
> > been warned
> > =20
> > 10.3.183.18 [gentoo]
> > =20
> > [+ B] 11.2.202.228 [gentoo]
> > [+ B] 11.2.202.233 [gentoo]
> > [+ B] 11.2.202.235 [gentoo]
>=20
> I checked on this when it was mentioned, I guess in the other thread.
> It appears it got changed when I did my upgrade. At least it doesn't
> crash now. It was enabled tho so I fixed that.
>=20
> New problem tho. I have Seamonkey's web browser on desktop 1. The
> email is on desktop 2. My local radar from NOAA uses flash. When I
> load it, I can see the image from flash on both desktop 1 and 2.
> Everything else is updated except the flash part. If I switch a couple
> times, it gets really weird looking. Looks like someone slipped LSD in
> my drink or something. Just weird colors and such.
>=20
> What's up with that? I'm going to try rebuilding a couple things to
> make sure everything is in sync. Maybe that will fix it.
>=20
> While I am at it. Is HTML5 going to replace flash? I don't mean in the
> next week but over a period of time. While researching this, I ran
> across posts that suggest HTML5 will render flash outdated. Just curious.
If you speak to adobe, they'll say no.
If you speak to apple they'll say yes.
Mobile devices have mostly moved away from flash. Youtube already serves=20
html5 videos, if only as a trial:
http://www.youtube.com/html5
Unless flash provides something that html5 or other code (e.g. JavaScript,=
=20
CSS, etc.) can't, I think flash is on its slow way out.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart1382252.vOuaMMzXRP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk+uMxcACgkQVTDTR3kpaLY10gCdEd5VPhJHDGRc/WpLpTiwoKfL
EkkAnAjH5y7e51SGd2jjeqH0wvWmir0u
=cfIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1382252.vOuaMMzXRP--