From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNhO4-0005zO-8o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:22:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FDA7E0605; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.epfl.ch (smtp4.epfl.ch [128.178.224.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E434E05AF for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13110 invoked by uid 107); 27 Apr 2012 09:20:30 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Received: from mathaapc14.epfl.ch (HELO mathaapc14.epfl.ch) (128.178.14.45) by mail.epfl.ch (AngelmatoPhylax SMTP proxy) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:20:30 +0200 Received: from wongwwy by mathaapc14.epfl.ch with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNhLq-0000z0-37 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:20:30 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:20:30 +0200 From: Willie WY Wong To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. Message-ID: <20120427092030.GE3115@mathaapc14.epfl.ch> References: <1335430048.18112.1@numa-i> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: bc63e22d-4796-478d-bf03-95b2def46838 X-Archives-Hash: 53f762b1e9c952ac6cbbc95b27933155 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:38:21AM -0400, Penguin Lover Doug Hunley squawked: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:47, Helmut Jarausch > wrote: > > I am at glibc-2.15-r1 on AMD64 with no problems so far, > > ditto here > Hey guys, I think we've pretty much established that Michael is running into an isolated problem or some strange edge case. Rubbing it in further really won't help, as he is quite clearly having an issue with two (or three) of his boxes despite y'all's success on yours. So can we please stop with the "works for me" e-mails? At the very least, if you were to post one such, please make it possibly useful for Michael by including your build options and such. Regards, W