From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SEyaU-0006Nt-WB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:55:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6EE5E0AF3; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C4E0AC3 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 832668088F for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:53:48 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:53:42 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: trouble understanding a slot conflict Message-ID: <20120403085342.4acca18f@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs35 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1Os=8dSpXEOZwyz1jcgG.IS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0d9d71b6-e9a9-4ec6-80e4-bf683819af26 X-Archives-Hash: 7dd31c48296124b3a81758488ffee8c6 --Sig_/1Os=8dSpXEOZwyz1jcgG.IS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:13:43 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Yes indeed I have it masked for exactly that reason. I will be going to > a combined / + /usr when the semester ends. I use this machine for my > lectures and assignments so prefer to break it from late may through > august. >=20 > I just tried masking the -r2 (and higher) pciutils. > But this conflicts with a newly-required hwids-2012-0401. > The later is required by a new usbutils-005-r1 >=20 > This led me to mask >=3Dusbutils-005-r1. >=20 > Now the proposed update world leaves portage happy, but me worried. I > haven't actually done the update world. It is reasonably to have so > much masking?=20 Yes. What has happened is that the ID data has been moved out of pciutils and usbutils, so hwids blocks the older versions. If you want to stick with the older udev, you need the older pciutils and this means you need a matching version of usbutils. All this will disappear when you unmask udev, as it did for me yesterday. =20 --=20 Neil Bothwick "Good Enough" is the death knell of progress. --Sig_/1Os=8dSpXEOZwyz1jcgG.IS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk96rIsACgkQum4al0N1GQNEmQCcC966mwCenIe5HhaomFzOR6oH QtgAn14ZYQZoaHRDd+otNd4ijiS7pM2R =BUAb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1Os=8dSpXEOZwyz1jcgG.IS--