From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDIZe-0007oU-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:51:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E937E0BAB; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karnak.local (cpc2-lutn10-2-0-cust603.9-3.cable.virginmedia.com [81.97.90.92]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A808E09DA for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECA83003 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:47:28 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at local Received: from karnak.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (karnak.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vbyp8L6b2dPQ for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:47:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from karnak.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D62A3002 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:47:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:47:20 +0100 From: David W Noon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought Message-ID: <20120329174720.25608338@karnak.local> In-Reply-To: References: <1332844604.4130.0@numa-i> <4F71BE44.3080206@kutulu.org> <01de01cd0c26$98088c40$c819a4c0$@kutulu.org> <4F71E12F.7060108@gmail.com> <000901cd0c40$0a137520$1e3a5f60$@kutulu.org> <4F720751.3020900@gmail.com> <4F72149D.7060605@darkmetatron.de> <4F721D30.8090400@gmail.com> <4F722735.90500@gmail.com> <4F72348A.2060407@gmail.com> <20120327235215.7834f4c7@khamul.example.com> <4F723F01.4040904@gmail.com> <20120328012023.50434b55@karnak.local> <20120328234027.33766b9c@khamul.example.com> <20120328230124.057e1472@karnak.local> <20120329002640.11ecf6e5@khamul.example.com> <20120329002004.6a4506a5@karnak.local> Organization: Luton Operatic Society X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/S4btFHvluE1qDUXaLplTanQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d153e1bd-89b7-45e4-ab01-b4edc0e67411 X-Archives-Hash: 1bd88eb75446178dc81f0f7bdc261f91 --Sig_/S4btFHvluE1qDUXaLplTanQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:08:40 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 19:20, David W Noon > wrote: [snip] > > The Gentoo developers have been discussing just that. =C2=A0The reason = is > > that many of the daemons that can be started by udev scripts require > > work files on /var, so we could well need /var mounted too. >=20 > But wait, that's what having /var/run being a link to /run was all > about. This problem is supposed to be *solved* already, damnit That's okay for PID files, but udev scripts are supposed to be allowed to run *anything*. --=20 Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwnoon@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* --Sig_/S4btFHvluE1qDUXaLplTanQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk90kh4ACgkQc9/LpQ70v4+XKgCdGCx8Noi5mR+uLTVnHcZjQ2wn XIoAnRswygit3Z3M8Dn6LefNhCJinQEf =aRma -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/S4btFHvluE1qDUXaLplTanQ--