From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-136740-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SASAC-0005VU-UU
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:29:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5593E0881;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3137CE0866
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:28:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so6325410wib.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization
         :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=IwpoJhZ5REapiaEpYKeXyvRwpL5hYlcUHrNPop/J6ew=;
        b=IhKPcxUFlqO1N1sHPKm01bz+MVWfmgWLqoNq8FbZOt1ZF2e2bmbJ/IkwKXvH5ivQx/
         dNx0jf57nqFEZTw5fbRovUYDdEtRV7vOZw8J/ANC6UxWcLhBVAcbASVP4MD+SKTXUdqs
         B//Bgmpt3VXTULSQzHdwqKHBSXc9iKk583CG6OVOkMgrO2OtzDS6th6Jf087HY6jD/pY
         J91UAOULB0bNBAaSdd+dQVqIct/grhx73zNQ72eoJMEh1I2smJkbFGceAJowyMtAfCby
         Juz2xJo31WMjFXoxIFAcnDTaSyzpvce+wvz5pttAc/IEuAC3oIAdeA4clvqDQ9IlKJze
         hsRA==
Received: by 10.180.95.74 with SMTP id di10mr54514885wib.1.1332361699212;
        Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from khamul.example.com (196-210-183-224.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.183.224])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j3sm11734477wiw.1.2012.03.21.13.28.16
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:27:20 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dovecot 2.1.3 fails to compile
Message-ID: <20120321222720.0c65e696@khamul.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F6A10AE.40606@libertytrek.org>
References: <4F69CBD2.2050500@libertytrek.org>
	<20120321162344.0be006d2@khamul.example.com>
	<4F69EC25.70006@libertytrek.org>
	<20120321180937.7caf53d8@khamul.example.com>
	<4F6A10AE.40606@libertytrek.org>
Organization: Internet Solutions
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 682f12d9-80d2-44a2-89c6-229dfc911247
X-Archives-Hash: 5fc41ca290803cc7254dfea443c1c2b1

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:32:30 -0400
Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:

> On 2012-03-21 12:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:56:37 -0400 Tanstaafl wrote:
> >> When I tried updating dovecot, it *successfully* emerged the
> >> clucene update first (it was already installed), then the dovecot
> >> build failed with the error...
> 
> > It's quite simple as it turns out. dev-cpp/clucene changed the name
> > of
> >
> > /usr/include/CLucene/clucene-config.h
> >
> > to
> >
> > /usr/include/CLucene/CLConfig.h
> >
> > As a quick nasty test I made a symlink, but that produced a gigantic
> > amount of build errors later on.
> >
> > I reckon you should file a bug and meanwhile downgrade&mask clucene
> 
> Done: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409205
> 
> Thanks! But I reckon if I'd have looked more closely, I could have 
> figured that one out for myself - guess I'm just too used to *not*
> being able to figure these out myself... ;)
> 

No worries :-)

But lets be honest, when you are faced with a zillion lines of gcc
output and an error buried in there somewhere, it's not exactly a walk
in the park to see what is going wrong.

Today I just got lucky and just happened to see the right thing at the
right time.


-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com