From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/shadow
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312222910.063104c6@khamul.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jjli7m$35r$1@dough.gmane.org>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:19:12 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/03/12 20:05, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> > These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in
> > #gentoo are worse.
> >
> > What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
>
> Paul's answers covers it, but I'll give an explanation that is the
> reverse of a fanboi answer.
>
> The reason we need virtuals is because of a shortcoming in portage:
> lack of "provides" functionality. RPM packages can tell the package
> manager what they provide. For example, RPMs for libav and ffmpeg
> can both use "ffmpeg" as their "provides" field. Portage can't do
> that, so it needs a new "virtual/ffmpeg" package instead.
>
>
Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
support in portage?
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 18:05 [gentoo-user] virtual/shadow Bruce Hill, Jr.
2012-03-12 18:50 ` Paul Hartman
2012-03-12 19:21 ` Bruce Hill, Jr.
2012-03-12 19:19 ` [gentoo-user] virtual/shadow Nikos Chantziaras
2012-03-12 19:30 ` Bruce Hill, Jr.
2012-03-12 20:29 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2012-03-12 22:34 ` »Q«
2012-03-12 23:54 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-03-13 0:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-03-13 3:46 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-03-13 16:04 ` »Q«
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120312222910.063104c6@khamul.example.com \
--to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox