From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S5nMc-0001Ko-Ba for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:07:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A339EE062C; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 00:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA49E094A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 00:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so5583wib.10 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:05:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rgW2gzsYywjbQU7ZrZWM4yWMa2d4AJlcOC5Q8m9NxQE=; b=ISeb+gf30c8x8npUbsieykkLelcjTjUkGO+PenqLQwGV2zeEfcZycbt6tD5qvbuixa 32QKc0q9JqLuC6f2hqQfanEYoc/u1kcHGVMNFxlozmvYkBhwB7RFpXZ9EescIN2vL7G5 3F696MJq4WEHzOQuO1slkIeIINeJIhDEdQFUTD9GoU7zqBeDEZbJcYWahb+BCYzRkw89 +WhMeIYme9B8zmfsRe3d1RLXJrwi5hu+ME2LHWZnhhIIFU25IICQbl9Hwr7Deb2Rrile JSsjCrWEiP2PE1jBqdl46LeydGGSPuNXlqQH2Lr9QUIGmuvXrXnhkxOkbL5ir3kIxtpP yu8Q== Received: by 10.216.132.98 with SMTP id n76mr45167wei.101.1331251540625; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from khamul.example.com (196-215-114-182.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.215.114.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl2sm1043444wib.4.2012.03.08.16.05.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:05:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:05:04 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Disk usage during emerge Message-ID: <20120309020504.18392405@khamul.example.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20120308025700.GA11477@eisen.lan> <20120308145526.GA3771@eisen.lan> <20120308220157.64a7d898@khamul.example.com> Organization: Internet Solutions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1f7ef59a-6604-48ad-b056-bd0354af9f0f X-Archives-Hash: 78922d875315b74423f409853441e66b On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:42:47 -0800 walt wrote: > On 03/08/2012 12:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > lsof | egrep '(deleted)$' > > From 'man grep': > > "Direct invocation as either egrep or fgrep is deprecated, but is > provided to allow historical applications that rely on them to > run unmodified." Deprecated by whom exactly? In the opinion of the developer? I strongly suspect that 1000s of sysadmins the world over are screaming in horror and telling the deprecator to shove off right about now... > Seems you've been promoted to the rank of Historical Application. > > Congratulations, and a very warm welcome to the club :) Thank you very much! I'll wear that badge with pride, right next to my "Pedantic Old Fart" label. And I dare say our very own Mr Bothwick will be standing right next to me :-) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com