* [gentoo-user] rng-tools @ 2012-03-03 13:48 Michael Mol 2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon 2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Michael Mol @ 2012-03-03 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user So I've been making extensive use of rngd on one of my Debian servers, and I wanted to make use of it on a couple of my Gentoo boxes. Only to find out that two parameters I need, -T and -R, aren't available, even when I unmask version '3' in portage. Even the manpage contains 'FIXME' where the Debian manpage contains much more information. The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? -- :wq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools 2012-03-03 13:48 [gentoo-user] rng-tools Michael Mol @ 2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon 2012-03-03 15:04 ` Pandu Poluan 2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2012-03-03 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:48:59 -0500 Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote: > So I've been making extensive use of rngd on one of my Debian servers, > and I wanted to make use of it on a couple of my Gentoo boxes. Only to > find out that two parameters I need, -T and -R, aren't available, even > when I unmask version '3' in portage. Even the manpage contains > 'FIXME' where the Debian manpage contains much more information. > > The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is > '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique > to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? > You should download the .deb and see if it contains custom patches (rather likely actually). If you want those patches applied, stick them in /etc/portage/patches/ in the proper place. I can never remember how all that stuff works, I have to Google it each time :-) Start here if you haven't heard of user-custom patch support in portage yet: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-791464.html http://klaig.blogspot.com/2011/07/how-to-apply-user-patches-in-portage.html -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools 2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2012-03-03 15:04 ` Pandu Poluan 2012-03-03 15:32 ` Alan McKinnon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Pandu Poluan @ 2012-03-03 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1316 bytes --] On Mar 3, 2012 9:05 PM, "Alan McKinnon" <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:48:59 -0500 > Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So I've been making extensive use of rngd on one of my Debian servers, > > and I wanted to make use of it on a couple of my Gentoo boxes. Only to > > find out that two parameters I need, -T and -R, aren't available, even > > when I unmask version '3' in portage. Even the manpage contains > > 'FIXME' where the Debian manpage contains much more information. > > > > The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is > > '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique > > to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? > > > > You should download the .deb and see if it contains custom patches > (rather likely actually). If you want those patches applied, stick them > in /etc/portage/patches/ in the proper place. > > I can never remember how all that stuff works, I have to Google it each > time :-) Start here if you haven't heard of user-custom patch > support in portage yet: > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-791464.html > http://klaig.blogspot.com/2011/07/how-to-apply-user-patches-in-portage.html > > Remember that it depends on whether the ebuild for the package support user patches or not. Rgds, [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1898 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools 2012-03-03 15:04 ` Pandu Poluan @ 2012-03-03 15:32 ` Alan McKinnon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2012-03-03 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:04:29 +0700 Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote: > On Mar 3, 2012 9:05 PM, "Alan McKinnon" <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:48:59 -0500 > > Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So I've been making extensive use of rngd on one of my Debian > > > servers, and I wanted to make use of it on a couple of my Gentoo > > > boxes. Only to find out that two parameters I need, -T and -R, > > > aren't available, even when I unmask version '3' in portage. Even > > > the manpage contains 'FIXME' where the Debian manpage contains > > > much more information. > > > > > > The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is > > > '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters > > > unique to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? > > > > > > > You should download the .deb and see if it contains custom patches > > (rather likely actually). If you want those patches applied, stick > > them in /etc/portage/patches/ in the proper place. > > > > I can never remember how all that stuff works, I have to Google it > > each time :-) Start here if you haven't heard of user-custom patch > > support in portage yet: > > > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-791464.html > > > http://klaig.blogspot.com/2011/07/how-to-apply-user-patches-in-portage.html > > > > > > Remember that it depends on whether the ebuild for the package > support user patches or not. That's true enough. epatch_user() must be called for it to work. However, it is defined in base.eclass and part of EAPI-2. How many ebuilds does that exclude these days? I did a quick back-of-the-envelope check: # find /var/portage/ -type f -name "*.ebuild" | wc 29846 29846 1730549 # grep EAPI=[234] /var/portage/*-*/*/*.ebuild | wc 11138 11273 719796 # grep EAPI=1 /var/portage/*-*/*/*.ebuild | wc 336 341 21938 # grep EAPI=0 /var/portage/*-*/*/*.ebuild | wc 5 5 275 37.3 coverage of >=EAPI-2. Wow. I really thought it would be more. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools 2012-03-03 13:48 [gentoo-user] rng-tools Michael Mol 2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping 2012-04-13 1:14 ` Michael Mol 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-03-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Hello Michael, On 03/03/2012 02:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is > '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique > to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? Yes, version 2-unofficial-mt.14* is a Debian fork. Quoting from its README file: rng-tools, unofficial Debian fork ================================= NOTICE: This is an unofficial version of rng-tools with a lot of added functionality and bugs, for which I assume total blame. Don't bother rng-tools upstream with problems you find in this version of rng-tools. rng-tools unofficial-mt is a living reminder to myself to not modify upstream code without sending the changes upstream at every step. Suddenly, you have a mass of changes too big to send upstream, and yet you find yourself without the energy to break them into smallish patches to submit upstream (i.e. to "unfork"). [..] If you would rather use Debian's version in Gentoo, give sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 a try, which I have just added to overlay betagarden: # layman -a betagarden # emerge =sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 If you would like to see features from Debian's fork in rng-tools 3.x and beyond, please step up and help rng-tools' upstream integrate Debian's changes. Best, Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools 2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-04-13 1:14 ` Michael Mol 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Michael Mol @ 2012-04-13 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > > On 03/03/2012 02:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is >> '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique >> to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date? > > Yes, version 2-unofficial-mt.14* is a Debian fork. Quoting from its > README file: > > rng-tools, unofficial Debian fork > ================================= > > NOTICE: > This is an unofficial version of rng-tools with a lot of added > functionality and bugs, for which I assume total blame. Don't bother > rng-tools upstream with problems you find in this version of > rng-tools. > > rng-tools unofficial-mt is a living reminder to myself to not modify > upstream code without sending the changes upstream at every step. > Suddenly, you have a mass of changes too big to send upstream, and > yet you find yourself without the energy to break them into smallish > patches to submit upstream (i.e. to "unfork"). > > [..] > > If you would rather use Debian's version in Gentoo, give > > sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 > > a try, which I have just added to overlay betagarden: > > # layman -a betagarden > # emerge =sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14 > > If you would like to see features from Debian's fork in rng-tools 3.x > and beyond, please step up and help rng-tools' upstream integrate > Debian's changes. Thanks to all who replied...I haven't pursued rng-tools on gentoo as I got a TRNG that's plugged into one of my Gentoo systems. Meanwhile, I've been working on a package called etools, which may be of interest and use to people who care about their system's entropy. https://github.com/mikemol/etools entwatch works and is useful now. entbuff worked before I started putting stuff in git. When I've got it working again, and once I've written manpages for it, the etools package will be ready for a 1.0 release. entmesh doesn't have a single line of code written yet, but it's going to be the jewel of the thing, intended to help solve entropy starvation issues in servers and virtual machines in environments where a trusted external entropy source might be found. -- :wq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-13 1:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-03-03 13:48 [gentoo-user] rng-tools Michael Mol 2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon 2012-03-03 15:04 ` Pandu Poluan 2012-03-03 15:32 ` Alan McKinnon 2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping 2012-04-13 1:14 ` Michael Mol
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox