From: Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:05:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120229020541.405ab461@weird.wonkology.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120229003235.4029cb1c@digimed.co.uk>
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
>
> > > > Don't reduce it to 0, the lower this value is, the more
> > > > fragmentation you will get.
> > >
> > > Why is that? I would have expected more usable space to reduce the
> > > need for fragmentation. I routinely use 0 on non-system
> > > filesystems.
> >
> > I read this often, and to me it seems to make sense. When a file
> > system is nearly full, writing a last big file will make the file
> > being cluttered along all those tiny places where some free space is
> > still left. And this probably already happens to some extent before
> > the filesystem is completely full.
>
> But if you set m > 0, the filesystem will become full sooner, so
> fragmentation will begin sooner (for non-root processes).
Uh, really? I wouldn't think so. With m > 0, there is much space left, in
large contiguous chunks, even though the user cannot use it all. But there
should be no difference between writing files in terms of fragmentation.
The reserved stuff acts just like a quota, at least that's what I always
thought.
Wonko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-29 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 11:37 [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!! trevor donahue
2012-02-28 11:52 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-28 13:37 ` William Kenworthy
2012-02-28 11:57 ` Mick
2012-02-28 11:59 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2012-02-28 12:24 ` [gentoo-user] " YoYo Siska
2012-02-28 12:50 ` trevor donahue
2012-02-28 13:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-28 13:01 ` Alex Schuster
2012-02-28 13:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-28 23:25 ` Alex Schuster
2012-02-29 0:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 1:05 ` Alex Schuster [this message]
2012-02-29 6:22 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 9:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-29 9:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 10:40 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-29 11:08 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 12:11 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-01 0:59 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-03-01 9:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 23:59 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-03-01 0:43 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-29 0:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2012-02-29 1:01 ` Alex Schuster
2012-02-29 2:38 ` Dale
2012-02-29 6:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 7:10 ` Dale
2012-02-29 7:49 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-02-29 9:23 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-01 1:09 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-03-01 8:26 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-29 9:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-29 9:19 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-29 14:44 ` Dale
2012-02-29 7:43 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-02-29 13:06 ` Daddy
2012-02-29 14:44 ` Dale
2012-02-28 16:14 ` James Broadhead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120229020541.405ab461@weird.wonkology.org \
--to=wonko@wonkology.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox