From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S0E7N-0002yK-L4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:28:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82686E12E0; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948A9E0E77 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A5A1B4059 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LyuKmPGmLSkX for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A05E1B4050 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0E5a-00006m-Nn for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:26:42 +0100 Received: from 66-191-154-2.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com ([66.191.154.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:26:42 +0100 Received: from boxcars by 66-191-154-2.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:26:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:26:50 -0600 Organization: none Message-ID: <20120222092650.283b6f4e@fuchsia.remarqs.net> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-191-154-2.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 9ad7d2aa-2337-455d-8f80-203765a26c7e X-Archives-Hash: 47fa93307e913f202a9430b5cc59533e On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:11:31 -0800 walt wrote: > On 02/21/2012 02:03 PM, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The latest stable x86 firefox fails to compile: > > ==================================== > > www-client/firefox-10.0.1/work/mozilla-release > > I noticed that firefox-bin (I got sick of compiling the damned thing > every two weeks) just updated this morning to 10.0.2, so I'd be > tempted to wait a few days until the compile-it-yourself version > catches up. I doubt there will be one until at least 10.0.3. Firefox 10.0.2 was released because of a security bug in