From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RzGMo-0002KA-Vi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:40:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 992E4E0C38; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB92E0B9D for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so6399027dad.40 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of matthews.willie@gmail.com designates 10.68.208.228 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.208.228; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of matthews.willie@gmail.com designates 10.68.208.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=matthews.willie@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=matthews.willie@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.208.228]) by 10.68.208.228 with SMTP id mh4mr55787137pbc.13.1329694754350 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:39:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmAvO3euMgshNC5hvORUI85lLKTIIzmCadfnZbo9naU=; b=fHJ5SbUNHJSBtd5+8VCH1L7H5pp6EP95AMW4T8DHOdgkkLXPNc6VZaOGSMUoko5CPK 3yP94vR2ywL26Y/zbLvrgd9o/qhZHgAmhnxqs8XOpa7mrAydTtkFV5euI4oCPAU+I7ZW s+rLPkjT5JkwCXznlUvoRK3HbM0IByt2Igb34= Received: by 10.68.208.228 with SMTP id mh4mr46058363pbc.13.1329694754293; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini ([184.7.64.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm11558419pbo.69.2012.02.19.15.39.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:39:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 From: Willie Matthews To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker Message-ID: <20120219153742.144b8d38@mini> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a474e7b3-d587-40d9-8bc9-b7584001b89d X-Archives-Hash: b744907cc01dd8f5bb6f83cd706b34ee On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:35:19 -0800 Grant wrote: > Has anyone found a screen locker they like? I'd like to move away > from xscreensaver. It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for > me anymore. > > slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay > fails with: > > !!! Fetched file: slimlock-9999.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED! > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 21746 > !!! Expected: 21479 > > and the comments in this bug aren't encouraging: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366405 > > - Grant > Try building from the gentoo source instead of the overlay! -- Willie Matthews matthews.willie@gmail.com