From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz6KA-0002OO-G0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:57:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 328C4E0C4B; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7421E0C0C for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werp13 with SMTP id p13so3339498wer.40 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of alan.mckinnon@gmail.com designates 10.180.81.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.81.66; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of alan.mckinnon@gmail.com designates 10.180.81.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.81.66]) by 10.180.81.66 with SMTP id y2mr9527373wix.20.1329656091023 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:54:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KMcJlUK0e9p2pFQoMx3Ru6LJLVli4ec303YGYADyxkA=; b=JSCCvJblDeQf3p+df+DkCIjd/q/+zsfikDpmGDMeKOeOt1FWxczw3uuoyXhbuFpQvM FanbtUs7+htfiU8julYcDVYhUlqfx0+iCKh99mHSsfazq56Q121u8Qnw8nsaDW+uc2sr eSUVjthO6nnoRpONXS7ga7dpPIsJIuOg4BJ5k= Received: by 10.180.81.66 with SMTP id y2mr8013479wix.20.1329656090981; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from khamul.example.com (196-215-2-107.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.215.2.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl2sm24100042wib.4.2012.02.19.04.54.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 04:54:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:54:44 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Message-ID: <20120219145444.7805ff88@khamul.example.com> In-Reply-To: <4F40F027.5070102@hfigge.myfqdn.de> References: <4F3F71D4.4040009@gmail.com> <20120218125414.7adcc7f3@digimed.co.uk> <20120218164258.036600cc@khamul.example.com> <20120218165717.1e7aa880@digimed.co.uk> <4F40D5DB.7000504@asyr.hopto.org> <4F40F027.5070102@hfigge.myfqdn.de> Organization: Internet Solutions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c19517d6-618d-41e7-8220-c164c6974028 X-Archives-Hash: cf41aa365f739bac45492883ac652def On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:50:47 +0100 Hartmut Figge wrote: > Thanasis: > >on 02/18/2012 06:57 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following: > > >> [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice > >> * app-office/libreoffice > >> > >> Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 > >> merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. > > > >Impressive. > > Yes. Perhaps i should consider using the source myself, because of > > hafi@i5_64 ~ $ loffice > /usr/bin/loffice: line 2: 12258 Illegal instruction > /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice "$@" > > which i just got with an i5. Should i? Should i wait for a fixed > libreoffice-bin? Hm. The case for compiling libreoffice is getting better all the time. Even on older slower machines, build time is gradually coming down as the ebuild maintainers strip out all the bundled libs that Sun added and use system libs instead. The days of >12 hour compiles for OOo are long gone (thankfully) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com