From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RynYe-0002hd-Ee for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:54:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39A45E0E9D; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DB6E0F67 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8E680764 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:53:29 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:53:23 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Message-ID: <20120218165323.5466c2fe@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <4F3F71D4.4040009@gmail.com> <20120218125414.7adcc7f3@digimed.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs29 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/fx3ii834067p55FxGu.J1l9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 03e33b67-85d7-43d0-bfd9-b9b7d011731a X-Archives-Hash: beb02dd9c81226dae57c4bc3b4b85ba8 --Sig_/fx3ii834067p55FxGu.J1l9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:31:45 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > >> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, > >> but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. > >> I get "instruction not permitted". > >> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. =20 > > > > It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. > > > > Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if > > you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) > Well, I don't have an i7. I'm on a Dual Core 2 Ghz E2180. Yes really > that old. Sorry, I misread the ie7 as i7. I'd still use the source build, as long as it could be completed either overnight or while you are out as work. --=20 Neil Bothwick An expert is nothing more than an ordinary person away from home. --Sig_/fx3ii834067p55FxGu.J1l9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8/14gACgkQum4al0N1GQP2OgCdGyHZV058JKrYJ73esBurkLiS ZZYAn3kv9LvztlSflApgRhltVKye/JQK =HQsd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fx3ii834067p55FxGu.J1l9--