public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:47:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201291947.15380.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F259A11.7000508@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]

On Sunday 29 Jan 2012 19:12:17 Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > have you read googles privacy changes yourself?
> > 
> > I just did - and there is nothing new or unusual.
> 
> I read some more on it but I'm thinking about what will be coming next.
>  It seems when a company goes public like Google did a while back,
> facebook is about too, they go downhill a bit privacy wise and it is
> like rolling down a hill.  It takes a while but it happens.
> 
> Thing about me having fastmail or something, it is me voting with my
> money, not me leaving with no vote against someone else's money.  Right
> now, google is only worried about the money from ads which is something
> I can't control.  If fastmail tries this, when I leave it is my money
> they lose.  Fastmail will think about me not some ad that may or may not
> be coming.  Since I will be a paying customer, I won't have any ads
> anyway.
> 
> I am looking into Yandex too.  Are they Russian or something?  I'm kind
> of leaning towards them for a couple reasons but trying to figure them
> out.  I'm trying to do this slow and with a deeper knowledge this time
> so I don't have to go through this again later on.
> 
> Plus, I just don't like being tracked all over the place anyway.  We
> have a big enough brother already.

As far as I can tell all that is changing with Google is they are going to 
join up in terms of user authentication, hitherto separate portals or apps 
they had.  I do not see a material difference to what is there now.

Fastmail, Google, Yahoo!, Yandex, et al, are all public ISPs and are making 
their money one way or another.  It is in their benefit to respect users 
privacy, but don't for a minute think that your info while in their systems 
can be deemed as private.  Unless you use encryption they can probe it, 
analyse it, read it, categorise it, etc.  Whether it is Google ads bureau, or 
CIA, or FSB, there is not much of a difference between them as far as the 
privacy of your data is concerned.

I think that you are worrying yourself unnecessarily, although there is no 
harm in being cautious all the same.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-29 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-26  7:16 [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes Dale
2012-01-26  8:47 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-01-26  8:48 ` Michael Mathurin
2012-01-26 10:07   ` Mick
2012-01-26 11:33     ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 12:56       ` Mick
2012-01-26 13:50         ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 14:05           ` Michael Hampicke
2012-01-26 14:10             ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 14:16               ` Dale
2012-01-26 14:34                 ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 16:04                   ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-01-26 16:14                     ` Michael Mol
2012-01-27  0:38                       ` William Kenworthy
2012-01-27  1:49                         ` Michael Mol
2012-01-27  8:47                         ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 16:20                     ` Mick
2012-01-26 18:36                     ` Mike Edenfield
2012-01-26 16:12                   ` Paul Hartman
2012-01-26 16:18                     ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 16:18                     ` Michael Hampicke
2012-01-26 16:24                       ` James Broadhead
2012-01-27  6:41                         ` Graham Murray
2012-01-27 14:53                           ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 20:45                 ` Daniel da Veiga
2012-01-26 15:13             ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 15:23               ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 14:12           ` Mick
2012-01-26 15:12             ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 21:29               ` Alan McKinnon
2012-01-27  0:48                 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-01-27 12:21                   ` Mick
2012-01-27 12:31                     ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-27 12:59                       ` Mick
2012-01-27 13:13                         ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-27 13:24                       ` Alan McKinnon
2012-01-26 21:47               ` Michael Hampicke
2012-01-26 23:02                 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26 18:09     ` Florian Philipp
2012-01-26 19:30       ` Mick
2012-01-26 19:52         ` Michael Mol
2012-01-26 20:06           ` Paul Hartman
2012-01-26 20:57           ` Neil Bothwick
2012-01-26  8:58 ` Walter Dnes
2012-01-26 12:36 ` Timo Briddigkeit
2012-01-26 13:07 ` John J. Foster
2012-01-26 13:59   ` Dale
2012-01-26 15:22     ` John J. Foster
2012-01-26 15:28       ` John J. Foster
2012-01-26 16:08     ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-01-27  0:08       ` Dale
2012-01-26 16:38 ` Paul Hartman
2012-01-26 17:11   ` Lorenzo Bandieri
2012-01-26 17:35     ` Mick
2012-01-26 17:38     ` Paul Hartman
2012-01-27  6:57 ` Dale
2012-01-27 18:49   ` Florian Philipp
2012-01-27 14:48 ` v_2e
2012-01-27 16:14   ` Paul Hartman
2012-02-08  8:55     ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-08 15:46       ` Paul Hartman
2012-02-08 15:53         ` Michael Mol
2012-02-08 17:17           ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-08 18:28             ` Michael Mol
2012-01-29 14:35 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-01-29 19:12   ` Dale
2012-01-29 19:47     ` Mick [this message]
2012-01-29 23:57       ` Chris Walters
2012-02-08  8:01 ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201201291947.15380.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox