From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhUV-00013r-Me for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CADB4E0952; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A663DE06FD for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0306804B8 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:47:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:47:46 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes Message-ID: <20120127084746.24407454@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1327624695.12117.4.camel@moriah> References: <4F20FDB1.1030100@gmail.com> <201201261007.53041.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126113314.28857d24@digimed.co.uk> <201201261257.00153.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126135046.196f8c4b@digimed.co.uk> <4F215DA5.4010003@hadt.biz> <4F21604F.2080309@gmail.com> <20120126160444.GA826@eisen.lan> <1327624695.12117.4.camel@moriah> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs17 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/4dcx4PCLUj5d9ZTQu/04fse"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8067f886-ba94-479e-8740-2eebd362d59b X-Archives-Hash: e64bb0af61aeef57cedd909932b22c66 --Sig_/4dcx4PCLUj5d9ZTQu/04fse Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:38:15 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: > To turn this on its head ... rather than hiding, is there a way to > create identical browsers that pollute their (google et al.) databases? Considering the huge number a people using the likes of Google (and no one has stated that they actually use something like this), such pollution wouldn't even amount to one speck of dust. --=20 Neil Bothwick What is a "free" gift ? Aren't all gifts free? --Sig_/4dcx4PCLUj5d9ZTQu/04fse Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8iZLcACgkQum4al0N1GQPG8gCgsAYS9AP/Zhu7t2w5EB64CAkR TVMAnjgQjDlPOuwp2m9wPYKQXjLpLDhY =rf7M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4dcx4PCLUj5d9ZTQu/04fse--