From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RoncK-0004M0-KD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:57:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DAACE086E; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A62E006E for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F70C1B4001 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:56:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NUgUk9HB7Xd7 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12161B400B for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ronax-0002vy-ML for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:55:51 +0100 Received: from wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net ([174.76.82.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:55:51 +0100 Received: from boxcars by wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:55:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: For those who complain Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:56:10 -0600 Organization: none Message-ID: <20120121205610.02f1f8a1@fuchsia.remarqs.net> References: <1327066986.235800.22.camel@stretch.local> <4F19D3B5.1080605@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: ed9363a5-d9b9-4605-9a8c-20b40f8f7532 X-Archives-Hash: ffc9ede110f6fb96a006caabde3c9c90 On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:51:01 -0600 Dale wrote: > So, it was a bug and Zac is fixing it. Sometimes when people > complain, it is because something is not working as it should. I never saw Hilco as complaining, just questioning. And in the post you quoted (and which I've snipped), Hilco basically said "This isn't working the way I think it should; could you please take a look at it?" It's a stretch to call it a complaint.