From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-133266-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Ri5bW-0002MV-7t
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:44:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA08321C0DB;
	Tue,  3 Jan 2012 14:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC4BE031D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 14:43:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by werm12 with SMTP id m12so9705606wer.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:43:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization
         :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=u9aibb8OwULNcYD3+kwDmoxCLvsjak+79JV8Par/3v4=;
        b=rDPW0qK4EqeRgQnaLCW58H0nmXKal2qaVB9xzZS5IZaLilAIkhL29NY98i/daS4uUM
         UpGTSViRxKD1iyQGdt8oh+eEXNqrDt6HFRNwrpCwGqjZSNTA5djg0V1VQjwvCK+UIeHG
         qYH2+CBOzyNfuHmzBPKzFQM0YkITKnkniyc3E=
Received: by 10.216.137.155 with SMTP id y27mr33914512wei.53.1325601802510;
        Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rohan.example.com (196-215-2-107.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.215.2.107])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fo18sm54930476wbb.12.2012.01.03.06.43.20
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:43:17 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev;
 version 3
Message-ID: <20120103164317.51d681da@rohan.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120103143120.GF2410@nicolas-desktop>
References: <20111115062115.GA3262@waltdnes.org>
	<20111121104724.GC7461@waltdnes.org>
	<20111201194544.GD4455@waltdnes.org>
	<20120103100445.GD1961@waltdnes.org>
	<CAA2qdGVZQdSLiPXwCiXxXAvMacwihqDjZ-wwL55V9dRVNnq+rA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120103123209.GB2410@nicolas-desktop>
	<CAA2qdGX-Hubx0QzsRJSkwJtTqGcSpNADi=4s52_RbPOremSCLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120103131346.GC2410@nicolas-desktop>
	<CAA2qdGXWWZe_xVWWKAWAcfwhaQ9MxOfat0PDzCbiedRXvYd-kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120103143120.GF2410@nicolas-desktop>
Organization: Internet Solutions
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 6ddbfa2e-e5cc-4e66-acb0-2820bbf9568f
X-Archives-Hash: 2db4f3d07ea923b1998e97b712533aaf

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@piing.fr> wrote:

> > Then again, using initramfs is yet-another-component waiting to
> > break.
> > 
> > Knowing Murphy's Law, it will one day fuck up everything.  
> 
> And the mdev alternative won't follow this law?


It's not immune to it, just statistically less likely to be affected.

mdev sans initramfs is a less complex solution than udev plus
initramfs. Ergo, all other things being equal, less bits to break.

 

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com